Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Time to draft a running back?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

TB had White coming off a high volume year and Sean Tucker as a solid backup. I think they’re happy they took Bucky in the 5th. 

And we have 9 picks as is. Could end up with 10-11 by the draft.

There really isn’t a position I’m all bent out of shape with drafting/not drafting. The team needs help nearly everywhere. Worst depth in the league.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers org has an obsession with putting money into the RB spot.  In terms of guaranteed money, the Panthers under Tepper have basically been committed to always have top 10 money in a RB. 

CMC to Sanders to Hubbard.  That's not worked out very well in the Tepper era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CRA said:

I maintain the same position I have had for YEARS.  We should never in reality be paying FA RBs or extending contracts to big money.  We should steadily be drafting RB year after year....and investing the real money elsewhere. 

 

I’m ok with one extension for a RB you draft while you groom the next one to take over as RB1

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RBs have a high level of attrition. I'm often in favor of finding some fresh legs mid-late draft who can either:

- Be a change of pace back

- Can catch the ball

- Are good with pass protection 

We did get Chuba as a fourth round pick, so there's precedent. Also, we need Brooks insurance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CRA said:

Panthers org has an obsession with putting money into the RB spot.  In terms of guaranteed money, the Panthers under Tepper have basically been committed to always have top 10 money in a RB. 

CMC to Sanders to Hubbard.  That's not worked out very well in the Tepper era. 

Overall I agree but Chuba will probably be outside the top 10 at his position by the end of the offseason, and his contract is not unreasonable and I think he played himself into it.

We do need to go get another back in the draft quite probably. We can't count on JB ever coming back, really, and if he does and excels, we'd be in a good position anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the draft is this loaded, there will be an UDFA available--we have so many needs--a rental could be an UDFA or a 1-year contract signing.  But I see a lot of talent and value at RB this year.  Lotta ways to approach the problem--not one answer, and if anyone comes across as there is, he is full of shite.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I quit following WalterFootball years ago so haven’t checked theirs. But literally no one else is comparing them to each other.  Not built or play the same. To say he is just a pass rusher specialist and say he’s not as strong as Parsons just tells me you have never watched 1 min of the film of the 2. Carter never was even a “Pass rusher” until this year.  Like Parsons.  He started as a MLB who they transitioned them more outside/pass rusher their final year. Parsons was never the strong tossing OL around at Penn State either.  That came about year 2 in the NFL when he continued to add bulk when he moved to the new role. Speaking of the 2,  Carter has More Sacks and More Tackles For Loss  at edge than Parsons did when they moved him his last year like Carter.
    • I did it because I had a hunch the people who were separating their shoulders patting themselves on the back for their opinions were in fact wrong about QBs before. Fifteen seconds of searching proved that to be the case. Again -- pointing out when the smartest people in the room have poor takes like those they disparage doesn't make me a Darnold fanatic anymore than it'd make me a Mayfield fan if I did the same thing, only a year later. That said -- Darnold's a product of what's around him being exceptional but it doesn't mean he's a bust. Brad Johnson and Nick Foles, among others, come to mind re: QBs elevated by their teams to Lombardis. I think history's proven no one could win with Matt Rhule as the HC. Steve Wilks took that same team to the brink of a division title and made it relevant for a month (the only month it's been relevant since Tepper bought the team).
×
×
  • Create New...