Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Bad Was Our Defense vs TB


 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

This is a QB School video about Baker, but he does a good job highlighting several of our defensive shall we call them 'miscues'.

https://youtu.be/EzeMMgPdRl8?si=ncD6dOEQsRIh3k_1

 

Lord have mercy 

that is abysmal 

there is no excuse for these defenders to not know where they are supposed to be

sweet Jesus. What do these coaches do with these backups during the week

run a simple freaking defense and expect them to at least be able to tackle and be in the right spot 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

Lord have mercy 

that is abysmal 

there is no excuse for these defenders to not know where they are supposed to be

sweet Jesus. What do these coaches do with these backups during the week

run a simple freaking defense and expect them to at least be able to tackle and be in the right spot 

Was a hard ass watch.

 

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TD alt said:

We were terrible, but that's to be expected when you look at the personnel. 

Exactly. We had street free agents (LaBryan Ray, Sam Roberts, Caleb Farley) other team's practice squad additions (Chandler Wooten, Jacoby Windmon, Cam Gill) waiver claims (Akayleb Evans) undrafted free agent (Demani Richardson, who btw played very well) taking the majority of the defensive snaps. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TD alt said:

We were terrible, but that's to be expected when you look at the personnel. 

Terrible? We are historically terrible. If we give up 39 points, we will have given up the most points in NFL history. If we give up the 176 yards rushing (our average), that will be the 4th most in modern history and the most in 46 years.

We are seeing history being made by this defense, so sit back and enjoy it. It might be another 30-40 years until we see it again.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...