Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Tankathon Approach to the remaining Schedule


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

That's a pretty good comp. I think he has really good extended play making/throwing on run under pressure abilities, but it's hard to make a living on that in the NFL. The one wild card he has going, is he has had access to the best training/coaching/etc. since the day he was born. That has to be a huge advantage.

And yet with all those advantages he doesn't show any plus traits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MHS831 said:

INTERESTING

The Giants are the only 2-win team.  Due to the Giants' strength of schedule, it is possible for them to win 1 game and drop to seventh in the draft.

Having said that, I am confident the Giants will not win another game. 

Having said that, I am not sure I would be happy in this draft with the #1 overall pick knowing that I needed a QB.  I have more confidence in Ward than Sanders, but, in my opinion, neither is ready to play in 2025.

So about that......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

As long as we are in position to draft Tmac we should be fine. We can go all defense the rest of the draft.

 

Instead of overpaying Higgins we can use that money on 2 possible starters on defense. Think smart Panthers.

I think Tmac is a stud as well, my only question is do you think he fits in with our WR corps/Bryce?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Well we have no elite WR on the roster, so why would he not?

WR corps are like a basketball starting 5,  you need a balanced group. Coker, Leggette both are vertical receivers which is a role Tmac excells in. I love Tmac the prospect, and wouldn’t be mad at the pick but personally I think our assets would be better used on a smaller faster slot option later in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shaq said:

WR corps are like a basketball starting 5,  you need a balanced group. Coker, Leggette both are vertical receivers which is a role Tmac excells in. I love Tmac the prospect, and wouldn’t be mad at the pick but personally I think our assets would be better used on a smaller faster slot option later in the draft.

Legette is a 3rd WR at best(likely a 4th or 5th). Coker is basically a AT replacement. He isn't blowing the top off any defenses.

The closest thing we have to an elite WR is AT. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...