Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Last 2 Games: Let's See What We have on the Roster


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, csx said:

Demani Richardson has played nearly 25% of the defense snaps this season with several starts playing in 12 games.

 

 Good point--let's take the person who some feel needs no further evaluation:  Richardson  Do you know which safety position he played?  How would he do at the other S position?  Big Nickel?  Nickel?  For example. How would Farley do at S?  Nickel?  Etc.  Jones?  What do you know about him?  We know more about Richardson than others, but how versatile is he?  Can he play other spots?  That is what this opportunity gives you.  I do not understand the argument to NOT take a look at some players before making offseason decisions about them.

Another reason you do this:  Experience for the players.  Injuries are something you must plan for in the NFL.  While Richardson may never be a starter, if he has experience at Nickel, SS, FS--he could become a more valuable reserve. 

In college, I started off as an outside LB--before the last week of practice, they gave me reps at TE.  They threw me a pass during the final game.  In spring practice, I was moved to TE. That brief experience in a game at TE was important.  The coaches told me that they wanted to get the "taste of blood" in my mouth, but they evaluated the 10 plays and critiqued my blocking, route running, stance, etc.  It gave them some talking points --things to work on--before spring practice. If you have no recent film on Raym or Farley at S or Richardson at nickel, etc. why not take a look?  A: there is no reason.  I realize that college and the NFL are very different, but I also realize that the best organizations have the "next man up" philosophy and they tailor their approach to the skill sets of their players--not the other way around.

Rivera would get us eliminated and then he would play to win at all costs; he was insecure about his record, in my opinion.

Take the evaluation to a new level--the playoff teams cannot do this--we can. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

This is an insane post.

Play To Win New York Jets GIF

I bet it is confusing to some--the idea of evaluating talent, collecting data, and providing experience to young players.  Now stop being a child and learn how to voice intelligent opinions without taking it so personally.  Do you have that capability?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I bet it is confusing to some--the idea of evaluating talent, collecting data, and providing experience to young players.  Now stop being a child and learn how to voice intelligent opinions without taking it so personally.  Do you have that capability?

 

Lol. Mr. emotional over here.

It's a dumb post. Let the coaching staff handle coaching doen the stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Lol. Mr. emotional over here.

It's a dumb post. Let the coaching staff handle coaching doen the stretch.

Emotional?  Hardly--but your post is yet another meritless personal attack, suggesting that you are suffering from some degree of hostility which is silly. You seem to be incapable of intelligent discourse because you offer no counter intelligent opinion or reasons why this is, using your extended vocabulary, "dumb." Your response "let the coaching staff handle it"  assumes that is not part of the equation and could apply to EVERY topic on this forum.  In other words, "you got nothing." Yet I clearly and repeatedly stated that this would be a tool for the coaches and front office to use during the off season. So I was saying the coaches would handle this--comprehend?  Who else would handle it?   Stop trolling.  Share your opinion and allow others to have their own.  Since what I have suggested is done frequently in the NFL--I was only suggesting certain players--your perspective is ripe with naivete (Google it) and without any supporting rationale.

A simple Google demonstrates this:  image.thumb.png.db71c892f0569b1e9499d124440fb0f9.png

BOY THOSE NFL TEAMS ARE DUMB.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I say this to my friends a lot lately. Most coaches have a shelf life. ESP in hockey, coaches hardly make it 5 years. Only the pens and bolts coaches have longer tenure. I think the leafs coach is around the same time as rod. The average life span of an NHL coach is 2.2 years, I had to Google it. With consistent playoff flame outs and this year, it’s getting time to really consider if Rod should be our coach. Florida won the Presidents trophy one year and fired their coach midway through the next year then proceed to lose in the cup finals and win it the next year. Rod has been a godsend for us. Took us out of being basement dwellers but think this is far as he can go. Unfortunately this cheap ass organization isn’t helping either. Maybe Waddell saw something and that’s why he left for a worse team.   I think Rod has lost the team. His style is taxing and clearly guys aren’t playing it on the ice.  They are playing a super soft version of it which is worse than playing any other way. I said last year that the canes should consider switching from man defense to zone. We don’t have the players to play man, esp this year. They are small and the big guys like KK, Svech, Burns, are playing soft and small. I don’t know, it’s just not fun to watch like it was the past 4 years.  Our game threads would light up each game with excitement. Hell I used to be Mr Positive all the time. That’s even gone. Something in that organization needs to change. 
    • This is what so many folks don't understand. Yeah, I do think that the SEC is the best football conference. No, they're not D1 vs. everyone else's D1-AA like the fanboys try to act like they are either though. It's not like they're in a league of their own that exists in some space between the rest of the NCAA and the NFL with the fanboys acting like they're much closer to the NFL than the rest of the NCAA is to the SEC. That's just pure delusion.
×
×
  • Create New...