Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: grading WR by ability to separate, YAC and catching the ball


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I think people are really underestimating how bad XL has been. 

Agreed. I’ll never call a rookie a bust unless it’s just a laziness thing, hopefully he can grow into his role but he hasn’t really brought anything to the table yet 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

i don't think he's lazy

i think there's just a distinct lack of dawg in him.

Yeah I wasn’t talking about him, when I say lazy I mean like Jamarcus Russel or Zion level. Where you know it will never work no matter how much talent. Those are the only first round guys I’d say you can call busts year 1 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

We have to be near the bottom of the league at YAC, can’t remember the last time a WR took a screen pass for a big gain.

Screen pass no clue, but Coker took a 30-yard pass an extra 53 yards Sunday before last.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thielen is not a surprise. Remember, he's a former Viking and at least historically, they've had some really great receivers in the past and today. 

If it wasn't for the dropped passes, XL would probably be a lot closer to Coker, I would assume. I have to remind myself that he is still very much a raw player and he's got more catching up to do learning his craft. 

Coker's an interesting case because I would've said he's not a burner but then he had that big touchdown against the Cowboys. For a rookie, he seems to be dependable on being where he should be which pairs well with the QB that we have.

Diontae... well, that's why he's still finding jobs elsewhere. 

Interesting where Harrison Jr is on that chart. If I'm reading that right, he really struggles with separation.

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mike Evans out there just in a league of his own.

That game where he went 200+ yards against us still haunts me. I admire the man as a player, but I'll also be thrilled the day we don't have to face him anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joe Bear said:

Screen pass no clue, but Coker took a 30-yard pass an extra 53 yards Sunday before last.

And JT had around 50 yards off a check down last month vs the Saints. Coker also had a good 20 yards off a check down, the yac was like 50% of the passing yards that game lol. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

We have to be near the bottom of the league at YAC, can’t remember the last time a WR took a screen pass for a big gain.

Off my memory, this team has generally not been able to run a screen that works to save their life. I still remember Cam got picked off a few times trying to run one. Probably the most consistent YAC concept we've ever had was Smitty's smoke routes; those were borderline cheat codes at times.

13 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

And JT had around 50 yards off a check down last month vs the Saints. Coker also had a good 20 yards off a check down, the yac was like 50% of the passing yards that game lol. 

That's about all I remember for the entire season. Meanwhile, I get envious of watching teams like the Rams and Chiefs. Constant little checkdowns and then it's 10~15 yards with defenders either seemingly out of place or well blocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

Screen pass no clue, but Coker took a 30-yard pass an extra 53 yards Sunday before last.

Yeah I guess that counts, but that was more of a busted coverage than anything. I was think of what DJ used to do where he would shake or break some tackles for a big gain 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same guy has other stats as well. After looking at all of them, my biggest takeaway is that stats alone don't tell the whole story, especially when one set contradicts the other. Also, how there's a lot of variables to consider, like how whether the Ravens receivers seemingly getting tons of separation is more on skill or because defenses being more focused on stopping Lamar and Derrick Henry running all over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Closer in level than us and the Chiefs or Eagles. But Bryce is still the worst QB in the league around here 
    • Gotta get the MVP on camera while they can.   I had Allen winning it coming into the game, but the fact the Steelers lost and the Ravens are going to win their division he has it sealed.   Now the narrative a 3x MVP goes into the playoffs can he finally win a SB or will the runner up Josh Allen take revenge on the league with his underdog roster and beat Jackson and Mahomes get his team to the SB.   These are the storylines the NFL is looking for.
    • Similar stats...so you just checking the season numbers? Now take a look at his stats when they actually play teams that are GOOD. Not the same.  Go ask texans fans how good slowik really is. Nico is a top 10 receiver NOW definitely. He also misses time due to injury, was he a top guy when davis mills was throwing him the ball? Nobody can seem to answer that. And I dont know how tank dell being quick is so significant. It's plenty of quick receivers in the league who arent good or make impact. Dell is good, I'm just saying he also has no pressure of being the main guy in houston...he is a 2/3. He would be the guy here by default. it's a stretch to say he would produce like a number 1.  5 times worse at what you said? Actually being a GOOD TEAM. I thought that was pretty straight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...