Who here was NOT HAPPY we won yesterday....

[PNW_PantherMan]

32 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Explain to me how teams like the Steelers, Bills, Chiefs, hell any team that constantly drafts in the bottom 5 of every round have maintained their dominant teams without the need to tank for a high draft picks? Seems your theory has a few holes.

Or how its always the same teams picking high.  Doesn't matter.

[Davidson Deac II]

The Tankers always mention Justin Herbert.  If only we had been one pick higher.

But the never mention that Herbert was arguably only the third best qb taken in that draft.  The best was Burrow, but number two is probably Jordan Love.  But due to some very bad analysis, Love wasn't picked until the 26th pick.  We easily could have had the second best qb that year without tanking or trading draft picks, if only predraft analysis had been better.  

[PadresPanthersFan]

Losing is for losers. 

good teams find good players. Plenty of teams continually pick at the top of the draft and continue to suck. 

Other teams continually pick at the bottom of the draft and continue to dominate. 

The point is always to win the game. Enjoy the wins when they come. Otherwise why follow a team if only losing  makes you happy. Go root for the white Sox then

[flagfootballcoach28]

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

Explain to me how teams like the Steelers, Bills, Chiefs, hell any team that constantly drafts in the bottom 5 of every round have maintained their dominant teams without the need to tank for a high draft picks? Seems your theory has a few holes.

Because we don’t have the talented  scouts or GM the teams you mentioned have. The higher the pick, the harder it is that our incompetent scouts and GM fug it up since it’s pretty obvious who the top 5 players are in this years draft. (Hunter, Graham, Johnson, T-Mac, Carter) Take the obvious blue chip players out of the equation, it’s almost guaranteed we’ll mess it up. Hence why I want a high draft pick instead of winning a pointless game that won’t matter in the bigger picture. You might disagree, but that doesn’t make you right just because other posters give you made up “Pie” 

Edited 12 hours ago by flagfootballcoach28

[pantherclaw]

4 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Because we don’t have the talented  scouts or GM the teams you mentioned have. The higher the pick, the harder it is that our incompetent scouts and GM fug it up since it’s pretty obvious who the top 5 players are in this years draft. (Hunter, Graham, Johnson, T-Mac, Carter) Take the obvious blue chip players out of the equation, it’s almost guaranteed we’ll mess it up. Hence why I want a high draft pick instead of winning a pointless game that won’t matter in the bigger picture. You might disagree, but that doesn’t make you right just because other posters give you made up “Pie” 

Oh yes, don't have talented scouts. 

Good argument. 

[Ricky Spanish]

9 hours ago, CBDellinger said:

The best player in the nfl was picked 10th overall by a team that had just gone 12-4.    
 

Evaluation is more important than draft position. 

Sir, I don't know what you're on but Jalen Coker went undrafted.

[flagfootballcoach28]

59 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Oh yes, don't have talented scouts. 

Good argument. 

Then give me a rebuttal instead of being a condescending asswipe 

[pantherclaw]

30 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Then give me a rebuttal instead of being a condescending asswipe 

Alright. 

Scouts are scouts. They travel. They evaluate.  They report back.  This isn't rocket science. Although people constantly want to blame scouts. Really?  It's grasping at straws. That's what it is. 

Damn right I wipe my ass. With wet wipes, because I can't stand a dirty ass. You don't have that problem though, as poo just falls out of your mouth. ..

 

Thanks for elementary school banter tonight.  

Edited 11 hours ago by pantherclaw

[Jackson113.2]

People on here can't be real or serious 

[flagfootballcoach28]

49 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Alright. 

Scouts are scouts. They travel. They evaluate.  They report back.  This isn't rocket science. Although people constantly want to blame scouts. Really?  It's grasping at straws. That's what it is. 

Damn right I wipe my ass. With wet wipes, because I can't stand a dirty ass. You don't have that problem though, as poo just falls out of your mouth. ..

 

Thanks for elementary school banter tonight.  

I said our scouts and GM. 

Here’s our last 2 drafts

2023

1st. Bryce Young (jury is still out, picked the worst of the 2 QB’s being considered) Seen as a horrible trade up by 99% of people  

2nd. Mingo- Bust

3rd. DJ Johnson- Bust

4th. Zavala- Bust

5th. Jammie Robinson- Bust

2024

1. Legette- Stone hands. High chance of a bust  Offense looked MUCH better without him. Journeyman David Moore was an upgrade. Could’ve had Ladd

2. Brooks- just lol Bust. could’ve had Dejean  imagine drafting a RB coming of an ACL who’s not even a generational talent? We did  

3. Trevin Wallace- looked horrible this year. UDFA LB’s playing better than him  

4. J Sanders- Mehh. Tremble has been outplaying him lately  

5. Wade- Mehh

6. Crumedy- who?

7. Barrett- cut
 

Makes sense you use wet wipes because you’re full of so much shiitt your dirty ass is too much for regular toilet paper to handle, old man. Look at our last two drafts and try and convince me our scouts and past two gm’s have been competent? lol. Hope you’re still enjoying that 4th win though!!!! 4-11 baby! Fug yeah!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited 10 hours ago by flagfootballcoach28

[csx]

43 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

I said our scouts and GM. 

Here’s our last 2 drafts

2023

1st. Bryce Young (jury is still out, picked the worst of the 2 QB’s being considered) Seen as a horrible trade up by 99% of people  

2nd. Mingo- Bust

3rd. DJ Johnson- Bust

4th. Zavala- Bust

5th. Jammie Robinson- Bust

2024

1. Legette- Stone hands. High chance of a bust  Offense looked MUCH better without him. Journeyman David Moore was an upgrade. Could’ve had Ladd

2. Brooks- just lol Bust. could’ve had Dejean  imagine drafting a RB coming of an ACL who’s not even a generational talent? We did  

3. Trevin Wallace- looked horrible this year. UDFA LB’s playing better than him  

4. J Sanders- Mehh. Tremble has been outplaying him lately  

5. Wade- Mehh

6. Crumedy- who?

7. Barrett- cut
 

Makes sense you use wet wipes because you’re full of so much shiitt your dirty ass is too much for regular toilet paper to handle, old man. Look at our last two drafts and try and convince me our scouts and past two gm’s have been competent? lol. Hope you’re still enjoying that 4th win though!!!! 4-11 baby! Fug yeah!

 

 

 

 

 

 

This guy is clueless  

[DaveThePanther2008]

Outside of the Dallas game we have battled contending teams. Had we pulled wins in those games we would be talking about winning the NFCS. It's important for us to show we can win those games. I'm happy for the win and we'll worry about the draft later. Remember Luke Kuechly was pick at #9. 

[R0CKnR0LLA]

Building a winning culture is important.

Just not sure a 4-5 win season where you don't beat a single team with a winning record is really accomplishing that lol

[PappyMay]

1 hour ago, csx said:

This guy is clueless  

I knew that when he said Barrett was cut. Traded for Jackson who has been a steal for what we gave up. 
 

while I do agree Ladd and Dejean would have been a better combo ,hind sight is always 20/20. Trevin has shown flashes and Chau will be our nickel next year. Sanders will be the starting TE and XL will be WR. Having 4 guys start in year two isn’t the worst draft. Could it of been better absolutely. Let’s just not blow our 2nd rounder this year.