Bryce May Not Be the Answer

[NAS]

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

I would not use the word incompetent. If they make no significant effort to revamp the QB room I would consider it negligence. And it's their jobs on the line not ours.

Lol you’re so delusional you think you’re a better roster evaluator than Morgan and Canales. 

[Jai Norman]

I think the entire organization needs a reset even the owner. 

[PleaseCutStewart]

4 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Bryce needs a perfect setup to play above average and it happened for a few games.  Any cracks in the overall team dynamic like today, he struggles. I think it's asinine to pour money and resources over all aspects of the team to prop up the QBs level to merely above average.  I'm thinking long term and if this Bryce looks like this again next year, it will be time to move on. 

Honestly, our goal for next year needs to be improving other positions and then see what we get from Bryce next year. If he isn't at the very least an above average QB, we draft a QB next year.

Edited 4 hours ago by PleaseCutStewart

[45catfan]

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Honestly, our goal for next year needs to be improving other positions and then see what we get from Bryce next year. If he isn't at the very least an above average QB, we draft a QB next year.

Yup.

[mrcompletely11]

7 minutes ago, NAS said:

Lol you’re so delusional you think you’re a better roster evaluator than Morgan and Canales. 

I mean if we are talking about just straight picks then yeah I am leaps and bounds better then them and the receipts are on here

[frankw]

4 minutes ago, NAS said:

Lol you’re so delusional you think you’re a better roster evaluator than Morgan and Canales. 

I do not claim to be a better evaluator of talent but I can see with my own two eyes this QB room has to change. And just saying but in fairness I wasn't enamored with the notion of trading up into the second round for a running back with a torn ACL but I gave them the benefit of the doubt at the time.

Appreciate the kind words as always NAS. You're so measured and rational.

[LinvilleGorge]

35 minutes ago, NAS said:

Lol you’re so delusional you think you’re a better roster evaluator than Morgan and Canales. 

Oh how much I've seen this same tired line trotted out over the years be it Hurney or Gettleman or whoever. What's the point of a forum for discussing the Panthers if this if attitude is that they're beyond questioning?

[Jackie Lee]

38 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Honestly, our goal for next year needs to be improving other positions and then see what we get from Bryce next year. If he isn't at the very least an above average QB, we draft a QB next year.

We have to upgrade the qb3 position for camp at bare minimum 

[Champagnepapi704]

4 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

If Sanders or Ward were to drop to the Panthers somehow (0.01% chance) then I could see that being the move. Otherwise I don't think they go QB.

Bryce's ceiling is Teddy Bridgewater that has some clutch genes. However, he'll be the starting QB next year. If he sucks, then its Arch Manning time.

That win at the giants was worth it though right...right?

[Bear Hands]

55 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I am really liking McCord on day 3.  How about you?  Rouke, Leonard and Howard would be okay late flier picks too.  Again, McCord is my favorite of the bunch though.

He has tools (size, arm and quick release), his negatives being more coachable stuff (decision making and inconsistent footwork).

I’ve been most impressed with the accuracy this year- his placement has been just really darn good at times. Shows why OSU recruited him. What he doesn’t have, and can’t gain, is the mobility/athleticism you want to see, but he’s not as statuesque as a Trask or O’Connell. He can fight for yards when he needs to. 

Definitely a mid rounder to consider.

[hepcat]

Bryce is what, 4-22 as a starter? Improved recent play aside, it's not groundbreaking to say "he might not be the answer" 

[NAS]

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh how much I've seen this same tired line trotted out over the years be it Hurney or Gettleman or whoever. What's the point of a forum for discussing the Panthers if this if attitude is that they're beyond questioning?

They’re not, but can’t have it both ways and not be able to admit you may be wrong too 

[NAS]

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Bryce is what, 4-22 as a starter? Improved recent play aside, it's not groundbreaking to say "he might not be the answer" 

He may not be but it’s sure as hell hard to tell when the club is a dumpster fire. It makes me remember how bad Baker and Darnold looked here. 

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, NAS said:

They’re not, but can’t have it both ways and not be able to admit you may be wrong too 

Never had an issue with doing that. Acknowledged that Bryce was playing better as of late. But today was Bryce of old. I just don't think he has the talent to hack it as a starter in the NFL. He's just too limited. There's only so much you can do schematically to cover for the deficiencies.