Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce May Not Be the Answer

Hoenheim

By Hoenheim,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, frankw said:

Indeed. It's very simple. If the draft plays out where the Panthers are up next and one of the top QB's are available Dan Morgan and Dave Canales cannot afford to say no thanks. It does not matter how Bryce Young plays over the next 3 games or what he did over the last few. The broader body of work is there for anyone to see.

You assume they will evaluate them as being franchise worthy QBs just because they’re top of their class.  They won’t draft one just to compete with Bryce. If they do draft in first round then Bryce will be traded.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, NAS said:

You assume they will evaluate them as being franchise worthy QBs just because they’re top of their class.  They won’t draft one just to compete with Bryce. If they do draft in first round then Bryce will be traded.  

I'm not assuming any of those things. What I am assuming is that Dan and Dave both have the basic awareness to know they cannot just stroll into next season at QB the same way they did this year if they value their jobs.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'm not assuming any of those things. What I am assuming is that Dan and Dave both have the basic awareness to know they cannot just stroll into next season at QB the same way they did this year if they value their jobs.

I guess time will tell if your assumption is right or will you declare them incompetent if they don’t see it your way

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't either because I don't think he'll be there.

There are only two QBs worthy of a top 10 pick with the top two needy teams conveniently sitting at #1 and #2 in the draft order--Giants and Raiders.

It ain't happening. Those teams are tanking and we will probably squeeze out at least one more win.  We also hold the tie breaker over both of those two teams if somehow we end up with the same record.  The Giants have a fairly tough last 3 games.  The Raiders would have a couple of winnable ones, but I think they still tank it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

There are only two QBs worthy of a top 10 pick with the top two needy teams conveniently sitting at #1 and #2 in the draft order--Giants and Raiders.

It ain't happening. Those teams are tanking and we will probably squeeze out at least one more win.  We also hold the tie breaker over both of those two teams if somehow we end up with the same record.  The Giants have a fairly tough last 3 games.  The Raiders would have a couple of winnable ones, but I think they still tank it.

Agreed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Experienced

TD alt

Posted
Posted

I mean, I don't remember too many people saying "Bryce is the answer," with their chest. He's still shaky, and in fact no one can say with surety that either Dave Canales, Dan Morgan or David Tepper are sold on Young. Hell, who here has said they're sold on him?

We need to bring in legit competition for him. The only question is how high that draft pick is going to be. Everything is on the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted

I still think there's a high likelihood Bryce is starting week 1 next year, even if his next few games have similar downs.  

But, this is the the type of draft where we absolutely should consider a low-risk pick at QB (after R1) to see how he stacks up.  He could be a pressure backup to Bryce instead of a vet.  And if Bryce implodes, you transition to that rookie, see if he's worth anything, and if not, onto a high drafted QB in 2026.  

 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, NAS said:

I guess time will tell if your assumption is right or will you declare them incompetent if they don’t see it your way

I would not use the word incompetent. If they make no significant effort to revamp the QB room I would consider it negligence. And it's their jobs on the line not ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I still think there's a high likelihood Bryce is starting week 1 next year, even if his next few games have similar downs.  

But, this is the the type of draft where we absolutely should consider a low-risk pick at QB (after R1) to see how he stacks up.  He could be a pressure backup to Bryce instead of a vet.  And if Bryce implodes, you transition to that rookie, see if he's worth anything, and if not, onto a high drafted QB in 2026.  

 

I am really liking McCord on day 3.  How about you?  Rouke, Leonard and Howard would be okay late flier picks too.  Again, McCord is my favorite of the bunch though.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Bryce May Not Be the Answer

      By TD alt · Posted

      For what its worth, as a Huddler and football fan, this is a lesson I won't forget.
    • csx
      Bryce May Not Be the Answer

      By csx · Posted

      I don't think he's using the term luxury pick correctly 
    • NAS
      Dissecting the offensive problems today

      By NAS · Posted

      1. Couldn’t run the ball effectively Zimmer took away the run game early and forced us to throw, especially when we got down early due to turnovers. Canales abandoned too early when we came out of the half he probably should’ve tried to re-establish the run 2. Pressure Cowboys defensive line generated significant pressure without having to blitz resulting in 6 sacks and constant pressure to disrupt the rhythm between Bryce and his receivers  3. Lack of separation on deep routes  Aside from the Coker play, receivers can’t get separation quickly enough to make them pay deep for stacking the box due to #2 above. Bryce also seemed less decisive than last few weeks, not sure if he was seeing new looks that made him hesitate  4. No YAC (other than Coker TD) Short throws were there due to two deep safeties but our receivers don’t have the ability to run after catch.  Not sure if this is also a schematic problem. Canales tried it with XL a couple of times. Conversely Dallas got a ton of YAC from similar short throws  5. Turnovers.   You can’t win in NFL if you do this. Bryce must do better. 
×
×
  • Create New...