Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce May Not Be the Answer


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Bryce will give us 6 or 7 wins next season and you lot will be "Look, let's give him one more year". At what point are you going to look in the mirror and say to yourself, "I want an elite QB". Battered Wives Club. The littlest positives make you happy. Wow. But hey, maybe in four years Bryce will get us 10 wins and a first round Playoffs loss! WOOOOOOO!

When the rest of the team looks like we’re a QB away.  You stick with him until he’s due for his 5th year option. If he doesn’t look like he’s the franchise QB then you move on. But drafting another QB isn’t the answer 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NAS said:

When the rest of the team looks like we’re a QB away.  You stick with him until he’s due for his 5th year option. If he doesn’t look like he’s the franchise QB then you move on. But drafting another QB isn’t the answer 

I think that depends... I don't think we should reach for a QB. But there is a scenario where we have a shot at one of the top 2...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Diehardpanth02 said:

How does it not make sense? Build the roster around the QB you blew your load on. Let it pan out while you build the roster around him and have him on a cheap deal. And when the opportunity arises you should be able to plug a good QB and see big results if Bryce doesn't pan out 

First round QBs RARELY go into their 4th year without the 5th year option picked up.  That is unless the team is having doubts. If Bryce looks bad to meh next year, we do not go into 2026 with him in the long term plans, period. Forget this year, it's too much of a mixed bag.  He's got one more year to prove himself.

All that said, I get the rookie QB contract concept, but that's only if he's THE guy.  I'm still not sold on Young. Next year focus on the defense and few more pieces on the offense.  If Bryce doesn't flourish, I mean completely ball out, cut bait in '26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NAS said:

He’s had 5 solid games in a row. It’s legitimately wild you just look for every excuse to poo on Bryce.  Even as dips are concerned, today’s performance wasn’t that bad considering the protection issues. If it turns into a downward spiral and regression we can talk

Your definition of solid varies greatly from mine. Daniel Jones meltdown was a huge swing in our only win out of those 5 games.

This Dallas team had a poorly ranked defense. There's simply no excuse for only 50 or so passing yards outside of the long TD to Jalen Coker. That specifically has been the concern about Bryce Young as a passer to the point where if he gets over 250 passing yards we have to pinch one another to make sure we aren't dreaming.

1 minute ago, NAS said:

drafting another QB isn’t the answer 

Luckily for us you won't be making that decision. Some other folks whose jobs depend on how Bryce Young performs will likely feel otherwise.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, frankw said:

That wasn't a dip. How many times does he need to bounce back? How many times did we let Kyle Allen bounce back??????

It's legitimately wild this is your standard considering you go out of your way to poo posts.

THIS.

And I've still not seen one Bryce Fan give us all a reason as to why they're so behind the kid. Is it because you're a Bama fan? Is it because of what we gave up to get him? Is it because he's a Panther? Why do you guys want to suffer year after year after year? Neat, he's "not trash". But he's also "not good". What IS it about Bryce Young that makes you want to stick around? Will we ever get an answer?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAS said:

They had one of the worst run defenses too yet you single out Bryce. The entire offensive gameplan was poo today. 

Canales deserves criticism and needs to give up playcalling duties but you also need to grapple with the reality that this passing offense just can't gain any real traction with Bryce Young behind center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think that depends... I don't think we should reach for a QB. But there is a scenario where we have a shot at one of the top 2...

You take one of those top 2 and surround them with this talent they’re going to struggle more than Bryce. What then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Canales deserves criticism and needs to give up playcalling duties but you also need to grapple with the reality that this passing offense just can't gain any real traction with Bryce Young behind center.

No evidence of that. We saw this offense struggle also with Dalton. It’s lack of talent and while I like Canales as a head coach and motivator he isn’t some offensive genius schematically

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NAS said:

You take one of those top 2 and surround them with this talent they’re going to struggle more than Bryce. What then?

I don't believe that. Our OL is good. We have a good RB. We have good young receivers. We need more receiving help and definitely a better D but Bryce has to overcome significant physical limitations that these other prospects don't have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Bryce young has become a religious issue, and tons of people this I’m just a hater who will never give him credit, but the main thing is this:

27 games into Bryce’s career, how many times has he played so badly the team hasn’t had a chance to win?

At least three times this season; weeks 1, 2 and today obviously. 

last year, how many? 7 or 8? And that’s me giving him the first game against Atlanta since it was his first pro starts. 

generously 1/3rd of his games he’s gone out there and it would have taken the Jesus Christ all stars to pull it out. 

This is who he is. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAS said:

No evidence of that. We saw this offense struggle also with Dalton. It’s lack of talent and while I like Canales as a head coach and motivator he isn’t some offensive genius schematically

I mean let's get down to the nitty gritty truth here. The best we've seen this offense at any point in the season was with Dalton. The only game where we scored 30 or more points.

And guess what? Andy Dalton is so terrible and washed at this stage in his career we had to milk his sprained thumb for weeks.

Raise your standards my man geesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's going to be a part of the team for the foreseeable future that's all I gotta say. Steal as an UDFA. 
    • Under Jerry RIchardson, the identity was always clear (with the exception of George Seifert). Defense first, run the ball.  Under David Tepper, I haven't been able to figure out who this team is trying to be. At any point. What is the identity? Are they an offensive team because of an offensive head coach now? Are they a running team or a passing team? Have they made any indication about who they are even trying to be? Dan Morgan said something about "needing more dogs" or something like that but they have no identity.  To quote Andrew Carnegie, "As I grow older, I pay less attention to what men say, I just watch what they do."  What do the Panthers do? Lose football games. So I guess that's the identity. 
    • 4 catches for 110 yards by a UDFA in his first game in more than a month is far more than "playing well." I swear a guy could put up 9 catches for 215 yards, 3 TDs and this board would say "he played decent but he's still not that good". It's OK to admit we have a star WR in the making.
×
×
  • Create New...