Currently at pick #4

[tukafan21]

1 minute ago, fanpanther said:

Just was reading the comments yeah not sure why he getting all the hate.  I think he is going to be amazing in the nfl. 

Because we don't see it with him, we see a system that was built for him to put up big stats like his dad intended to do, and we see a player with serious red flags outside of his actual on field abilities as well.

Even if you think he will make it in the NFL, coming to a franchise as much of a mess as we are, is not how a player like him will succeed at the next level, it's only going to create problems.

The Deion show is going to be wild in the NFL, our franchise isn't in a state to handle it properly (and that's ignoring that many don't see him as an elite prospect at the same time).

[Shocker]

The only worry I have with Hunter right now in 185.  Pretty slight in the build dept

[CamWhoaaCam]

18 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm fine, I just want us to draft with our head's for once and not the media darling of the year.  

Can you breath with Deion's nuts so far down your throat?

I mean you're the one who's been venting about how much you hate Hunter and the Sanders family. I think we get it. No need to keep repeating yourself every post in every thread.

 

Here's a beer on me buddy.

[tukafan21]

17 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I noticed New England has the second strongest scheduled left.  Is that already computed\included in SOS by talkathon?

Yes, tankathon doesn't just include the teams you've played so far, they do your entire 17 game schedule.

So who you still play doesn't change your SOS on there, just how all the teams on your schedule do each week.

So if the Packers beat Seattle tonight, since the Jags played GB, their SOS will rise, no idea if it will be enough to give us the 4th pick back at the moment.

Edited 15 hours ago by tukafan21

[Shocker]

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Yes, tankathon doesn't just include the teams you've played so far, they do your entire 17 game schedule.

So who you still play doesn't change your SOS on there, just how all the teams on your schedule do each week.

So if the Packers beat Seattle tonight, since the Jags played GB, their SOS will rise, no idea if it will be enough to give us the 4th pick back at the moment.

Great info, appreciate it

[45catfan]

It's going to be T-Mac-WR, Johnson-CB, Graham-DT or Carter-Edge.  Hunter, Ward and Sanders will be gone.  So we can get the best defensive player or the best pure WR.  Still pretty good.

[Shocker]

Just now, 45catfan said:

It's going to be T-Mac-WR, Johnson-CB, Graham-DT or Carter-Edge.  Hunter, Ward and Sanders will be gone.  So we can get the best defensive player or the best pure WR.  Still pretty good.

[CamWhoaaCam]

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It's going to be T-Mac-WR, Johnson-CB, Graham-DT or Carter-Edge.  Hunter, Ward and Sanders will be gone.  So we can get the best defensive player or the best pure WR.  Still pretty good.

Brown/Graham DT duo sounds terrifying.

 

 

[45catfan]

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Bro, it doesn't take Ray Charles to see it going down like this:

[CamWhoaaCam]

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Bro, it doesn't take Ray Charles to see it going down like this:

I said this earlier. Those 3 are definitely going to be the first 3 off the board.

 

You basically hit it on the head will we go Tmac/Graham/Johnson those are our options as it currently stands.

[tukafan21]

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Brown/Graham DT duo sounds terrifying.

 

 

It does

But we also only have one player that I think has a realistic shot at being an All Pro next year, and that player is a DT in Brown.

Taking a DT at 4 or 5 would be the most luxury pick a team could ever make given the holes we have.

I'd just hope some team around the 10th pick would badly want a player there and we are able to get a good enough offer to make trading back worth it.

 

[CamWhoaaCam]

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

It does

But we also only have one player that I think has a realistic shot at being an All Pro next year, and that player is a DT in Brown.

Taking a DT at 4 or 5 would be the most luxury pick a team could ever make given the holes we have.

I'd just hope some team around the 10th pick would badly want a player there and we are able to get a good enough offer to make trading back worth it.

 

I agree. I was just saying Brown/Graham is just a terrifying thought as a duo.

 

In order I probably have Tmac, Johnson, Graham.

 

[Brooklyn 3.0]

Doesn't matter where we pick if Bryce is still our QB.

[MHS831]

This may have been said repeatedly on here, but I have not seen it nor do I read 8 pages of posts when it is mostly shirt talk because people do not respect another's opinion--

If the Panthers somehow pick third (and I see it as a possibility) they will take Travis Hunter, and in my view, he needs to play WR.  Imagine Hunter as the #1, Thielen, Coker, XL as outside weapons.  I am guessing that Sanders (TE) improves and we could try to sign Mike Jackson (CB) to a longer deal-

However, I see the Giants, Raiders, and Patriots picking at the top of the draft.  Hunter will be in New England in all likelihood. 

The Raiders, however, have a shot to lose a game.  Tonight vs. Atlanta in Vegas, they could upset the Falcannots.  They then play Jax on the 22nd--at home--and they should be favored.  Then on to New Orleans--a slim chance at a victory--and then the Chargers--who will likely have a playoff spot clinched without a first round bye.  I do not know if Harbaugh would rest his starters, but he should.

Jax is ahead of us now, but they finish with Vegas, Tennessee, and Indy.  Surely the win one of those, but if not, they will pick after the Pats.  We want them to lose to Vegas, beat Tennessee or Indy.