XL can’t catch.

[kungfoodude]

54 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Paging @tukafan21

 

If Tmac is not available I still think we need to take the next best WR. So who else is on your board at WR besides Tmac?

After Hunter and McMillian there is a MASSIVE drop off in terms of elite guys. If they are gone at our pick, you take something other than a WR. It would be a way bigger reach than XL at 32.

This is a bad WR draft on paper.

[Joe Bear]

Just now, kungfoodude said:

After Hunter and McMillian there is a MASSIVE drop off in terms of elite guys. If they are gone at our pick, you take something other than a WR. It would be a way bigger reach than XL at 32.

This is a bad WR draft on paper.

They should all be there at 1.

[Tr3ach]

38 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Not with a Top 5 pick, and if we trade down, it's for an edge rusher that makes sense in that 10-12 range as opposed to the Top 5.

Like the player, just don't like how he aligns with our draft position

Tmac and xl is a terrible combo.  If we had taken Ladd at the draft last year like some of us wanted, then sure.  Tmac and XL would give us the least shifty, least burst wr tandem in the league.

[Joe Bear]

5 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Laquon Treadwell 2.0

Xavier Jarrette

[CamWhoaaCam]

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

In no way shape or form has Bryce shown anything near enough of being a franchise QB to trade away our 2026 1st round pick this offseason, that’s just a flat out stupid take.

When did I say trade our 2026 1st?

 

Man you be saying anything to prove a point smh 

[kungfoodude]

Just now, Joe Bear said:

They should all be there at 1.

Lol. We will not be anywhere near #1. Likely in the 5-10 range. Which means we are not likely to be able to get them.

[Joe Bear]

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Lol. We will not be anywhere near #1. Likely in the 5-10 range. Which means we are not likely to be able to get them.

3-14 gets you No. 1.

[kungfoodude]

2 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

3-14 gets you No. 1.

I don't think you have looked at the standings recently.

[CamWhoaaCam]

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

After Hunter and McMillian there is a MASSIVE drop off in terms of elite guys. If they are gone at our pick, you take something other than a WR. It would be a way bigger reach than XL at 32.

This is a bad WR draft on paper.

That sucks. We really need a true #1. I agree it would be stupid to reach on a WR with that high of a pick. I was thinking trade back, but if there isn't a true #1 that wouldn't make much sense either.

 

I guess it's Tmac or bust.

[tukafan21]

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

When did I say trade our 2026 1st?

 

Man you be saying anything to prove a point smh 

Again, do you ever even read my posts or just see it's me and jump in there saying anything you want?

Someone said to trade our 2026 1st for DK

I responded to that saying Bryce hasn't shown near enough to give up our 2026 1st in a QB heavy draft.

You jump in there saying Bryce is looking like the future.

I respond reiterating that he hasn't shown near enough to trade our 26 1st, since that was my point initially.

It's not hard to follow along man, just read.

[Joe Bear]

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think you have looked at the standings recently.

The odds on the Jags and Raiders winning another game are infinitely higher than the Panthers winning again.

[tukafan21]

5 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Tmac and xl is a terrible combo.  If we had taken Ladd at the draft last year like some of us wanted, then sure.  Tmac and XL would give us the least shifty, least burst wr tandem in the league.

And I've said we need that fast quick twitch slot guy as well, but if you draft Burden to be that guy, it still screws us over as we'd have a MASSIVE hole on the outside by still not having a true #1.

And once you then spent back to back 1st rounders on WR, as well as having Coker, plus all the holes in our defense, you're not splashing in free agency to get an outside #1 or using another 1st rounder the following year to get one.

So since you can get those quick twitch slot WRs in the middle rounds or in FA, you don't over draft one at the top of the 1st round just because we need one.

And this isn't an argument for T-Mac, it's an argument about building up a complete roster, not forcing picks to fill a need despite it not being the right draft slot to do so.

[CamWhoaaCam]

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

Again, do you ever even read my posts or just see it's me and jump in there saying anything you want?

Someone said to trade our 2026 1st for DK

I responded to that saying Bryce hasn't shown near enough to give up our 2026 1st in a QB heavy draft.

You jump in there saying Bryce is looking like the future.

I respond reiterating that he hasn't shown near enough to trade our 26 1st, since that was my point initially.

It's not hard to follow along man, just read.

You replied to me as if I made the take. Are you confusing me with someone else?

[kungfoodude]

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

That sucks. We really need a true #1. I agree it would be stupid to reach on a WR with that high of a pick. I was thinking trade back, but if there isn't a true #1 that wouldn't make much sense either.

 

I guess it's Tmac or bust.

Honestly, depends on where we end up. If you end up in the 4 to 6ish range, you are probably better off trying to snag one of the very few elite rated guys than trade down into the crapshoot area. That said, this draft is supposedly fairly loaded with B caliber guys that can be solid starting players/rotational guys. 

I also really hate trading down as a Panthers fan because about 99.8% of the time we fug that up. We almost always fug up trading up.

IDK....we will see what happens. We just need to channel our inner Hurney in the 1st.