Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Free agent WR targets?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Stingray3030 said:

The vast majority of the stars on those teams were all drafted - including every one of the QB's.  They were all deep running playoff teams who picked up extra pieces, not bottom of the league rebuilders.

Texans actually earned the #2/CJ Stroud pick by sucking, got a new coach, traded up to draft Will Anderson, drafted Tank Dell and basically did a 180. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drafting T-Mac fixes almost all our WR problems, after that we just need to find that shifty quick twitch slot guy and we're set at WR for a number of years.

T-Mac as the #1, XL as the #2, Coker and a quick twitch guy in the slot.  That's a young core that has best WR room in the NFL type of upside.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Drafting T-Mac fixes almost all our WR problems, after that we just need to find that shifty quick twitch slot guy and we're set at WR for a number of years.

T-Mac as the #1, XL as the #2, Coker and a quick twitch guy in the slot.  That's a young core that has best WR room in the NFL type of upside.  

I've done some draft stuff and if tmac runs fast at combine- he's my clear #1 for Carolina.

People are talking he's slow, I don't believe that. I think after training and focus, he will be 4.4 fast. Even if he's 4.6 he's still a top ten pick. 

 

100% Carolina needs WRS. They only have XL and coker. AT maybe cut and if not he's 78 years old. Most teams carry 6.....one carry the 4...... look at Panthers cap and weak WR pool......... Panthers need to draft 2 WRs and find another UDFA jewel....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I've done some draft stuff and if tmac runs fast at combine- he's my clear #1 for Carolina.

People are talking he's slow, I don't believe that. I think after training and focus, he will be 4.4 fast. Even if he's 4.6 he's still a top ten pick. 

 

100% Carolina needs WRS. They only have XL and coker. AT maybe cut and if not he's 78 years old. Most teams carry 6.....one carry the 4...... look at Panthers cap and weak WR pool......... Panthers need to draft 2 WRs and find another UDFA jewel....

 

 

Anyone who thinks T-Mac is slow is just looking at him being 6'5" and making an assumption based on his height that he's a plodding big man.

If someone has watched him play, you can see that no, he's not a track star who is going to run in the 4.3's, but he absolutely is going to end up sub 4.5 as he has more than enough speed for the position.

He'll already be the #1 WR on almost every team's board before the combine, but after they see him do the same drills right next to the other WRs, it will be clear and obvious to every GM there in person that he's the top WR in the draft, by a decent distance.

If Hunter or Burden were more true outside WRs instead of likely slot type of guys, it could be different, but with that being the case, there really is no argument for either being higher on team's WR rankings.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Anyone who thinks T-Mac is slow is just looking at him being 6'5" and making an assumption based on his height that he's a plodding big man.

If someone has watched him play, you can see that no, he's not a track star who is going to run in the 4.3's, but he absolutely is going to end up sub 4.5 as he has more than enough speed for the position.

He'll already be the #1 WR on almost every team's board before the combine, but after they see him do the same drills right next to the other WRs, it will be clear and obvious to every GM there in person that he's the top WR in the draft, by a decent distance.

If Hunter or Burden were more true outside WRs instead of likely slot type of guys, it could be different, but with that being the case, there really is no argument for either being higher on team's WR rankings.

Why do you keep talking about Hunter bro?

 

He mentioned Tmac and you had to drag Hunter name into it. Let it go bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Why do you keep talking about Hunter bro?

 

He mentioned Tmac and you had to drag Hunter name into it. Let it go bro.

The post had nothing to do with Hunter specifically, but again, you see me mention his name and just take it as a slight to him.  It was a post regarding the WR position at the top of this draft, of which, there are 3 who are clearly better than the rest, one of whom just so happens to be Hunter.

The only reason I brought up Hunter and Burden was to point how how they are both likely slot WRs compared to T-Mac being an outside WR, and for me, that's a key differentiator in the end when you need to rank all 3 on a team's big board.

If there was a team at the top of the draft with a clear outside #1 WR, then I think they would be a team more likely to take Hunter or Burden if they want a WR, as they would be a better pairing.

This is also a perfect example of why I can't stand your draft/FA analysis of players, because you can't separate individual players and the need/fit with a particular team.  You take everything about the players in a vacuum by itself, which is the worst way to evaluate player movement.

You also only took issue with me bringing up Hunter, not Burden, because again, you seem unable to view my posts as anything other than Hunter shade, when they're really comparing players at a specific position and comparing them to our current roster and needs.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

The post had nothing to do with Hunter specifically, but again, you see me mention his name and just take it as a slight to him.  It was a post regarding the WR position at the top of this draft, of which, there are 3 who are clearly better than the rest, one of whom just so happens to be Hunter.

The only reason I brought up Hunter and Burden was to point how how they are both likely slot WRs compared to T-Mac being an outside WR, and for me, that's a key differentiator in the end when you need to rank all 3 on a team's big board.

If there was a team at the top of the draft with a clear outside #1 WR, then I think they would be a team more likely to take Hunter or Burden if they want a WR, as they would be a better pairing.

This is also a perfect example of why I can't stand your draft/FA analysis of players, because you can't separate individual players and the need/fit with a particular team.  You take everything about the players in a vacuum by itself, which is the worst way to evaluate player movement.

You also only took issue with me bringing up Hunter, not Burden, because again, you seem unable to view my posts as anything other than Hunter shade, when they're really comparing players at a specific position and comparing them to our current roster and needs.

You and I want the same player dude. Hunter is not going to be available. I been screaming Tmac for the past month.

 

It's funny you question my draft analysis when I literally called both XL and Sanders in the draft. Obviously the Panthers were listening...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

You and I want the same player dude. Hunter is not going to be available. I been screaming Tmac for the past month.

 

It's funny you question my draft analysis when I literally called both XL and Sanders in the draft. Obviously the Panthers were listening...

 

You were the loudest proponent on this board for Bryce and claimed we would be SB contenders his rookie year.

He ended up with the worst rookie season for a QB in NFL history and we ended up with the #1 pick that we didn't even own.

You have no leg to stand on with draft analysis.

Beyond that... you were the same person who was bashing me for pushing T-Mac a few months ago and saying you'd take Hunter over him as a WR without question.  The only reason you've even come around on T-Mac is because of me and my analysis of him and you then forcing yourself to watch him more and in the end, you realized that I was correct.

So please, keep telling me how you know better than me, I'm listening....................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

You were the loudest proponent on this board for Bryce and claimed we would be SB contenders his rookie year.

He ended up with the worst rookie season for a QB in NFL history and we ended up with the #1 pick that we didn't even own.

You have no leg to stand on with draft analysis.

Beyond that... you were the same person who was bashing me for pushing T-Mac a few months ago and saying you'd take Hunter over him as a WR without question.  The only reason you've even come around on T-Mac is because of me and my analysis of him and you then forcing yourself to watch him more and in the end, you realized that I was correct.

So please, keep telling me how you know better than me, I'm listening....................

Never said I know better than you. You also only holding me accountable for Bryce.

 

What about Jayden Daniels? Remember I said I would take him #1 overall. 

What about Brock Bowers? I said he would be the best offensive player in the draft over the hyped Harrison Jr. 

 

I was right about a lot last draft including nailing our 2 rookie picks.

 

Your resume doesn't stack up with mine if we being honest. What did you call in the draft?

Edited by CamWhoaaCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Never said I know better than you. You also only holding me accountable for Bryce.

 

What about Jayden Daniels? Remember I said I would take him #1 overall. 

What about Brock Bowers? I said he would be the best offensive player in the draft over the hyped Harrison Jr. 

 

I was right about a lot last draft including nailing our 2 rookie picks.

 

Your resume doesn't stack up with mine if we being honest. What did you call in the draft?

lol, you've proven over the last 2 years that you view everything through a Madden lens of flash and not substance based in NFL realities.  

The number of absolutely asinine ideas that you've thrown out over the last couple of years is just comical.  For example, you spent all of last season saying we needed to sign Higgins this past offseason, where I kept telling you that he wasn't even going to hit the market, but you wouldn't stop beating that drum.

You think real life NFL is a Madden video game, both in the moves you can make and how you grade out players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

lol, you've proven over the last 2 years that you view everything through a Madden lens of flash and not substance based in NFL realities.  

The number of absolutely asinine ideas that you've thrown out over the last couple of years is just comical.  For example, you spent all of last season saying we needed to sign Higgins this past offseason, where I kept telling you that he wasn't even going to hit the market, but you wouldn't stop beating that drum.

You think real life NFL is a Madden video game, both in the moves you can make and how you grade out players.

You low-key respect my football analysis. Its how you remember more stuff I say then I do.

 

Keep taking notes. I'm just perfecting my craft. You thought I was on fire last draft wait until I start watching these prospects in the upcoming draft.

 

I'm basically the GM at this point. I called XL and Sanders. Let me cook!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You low-key respect my football analysis. Its how you remember more stuff I say then I do.

 

Keep taking notes. I'm just perfecting my craft. You thought I was on fire last draft wait until I start watching these prospects in the upcoming draft.

 

I'm basically the GM at this point. I called XL and Sanders. Let me cook!

I high key think you're one of the worst football analysts I've ever seen, and I've told you as such.

I remember some of yours because they are so astoundingly ignorant of real life NFL implications despite your insistence of being correct.

Hell, even in this post you say something downright comical.

You're literally bragging about correctly guessing who we'd draft, not even about who they are as players.  That in itself just shows how you can't seem to view anything in the correct lens.

I correctly predicted we would draft Bryce, but you don't see me bragging about that.  I also correctly predicted exactly the type of QB he would be at this level, and I'm still not bragging about that because it was that obvious, yet you still thought he was the second coming and would lead us to the SB hunt last year.

But go on, keep telling me how awesome you are at this.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • GlucoTrust missing that extra piece of cake really kill you'll??? It may feel like that but honestly it won't. I have had many arguments with myself over-the-counter pros and cons of experiencing that extra piece of cake I dont really need, truly just taste so good that I couldnt pass it shifting upward. Making sure that you get a these little treats you will ever have will make certain you have the desire power to avoid at 1 piece of cake. Its easy to say yes, its hard but much more rewarding state he no. Read More....>>>>> https://sites.google.com/view/glucotrust-benefits-web/home https://supplementamazon.com/buy-glucotrust/ https://supplementamazon.blogspot.com/2024/12/glucotrust-does-it-really-works-or-scam.html https://groups.google.com/g/glucotrust-benefits-web/c/n9u5VNMm3EI https://glucotrust-benefits.company.site/ https://glucotrust-does-it-really-works-or-a-sc.webflow.io/ https://glucotrust-benefits.hashnode.dev/glucotrust-does-it-work-or-scam-what-they-wont-say-before-buy https://medium.com/@glucotrustweb_17177/glucotrust-key-highlights-how-does-it-work-ba3272c6a547 https://gamma.app/docs/GlucoTrust-A-Revolutionary-Approach-to-Blood-Sugar-Management-uvmsp97y38ocdce  
    • Why I think the Jags may not be picking in the top 5:  They could run the table--but I do not know how you play these teams without 2-3 wins.  If LV wins, it hurts their chances--I think the split with Tennessee, and beat the Jets at home-- Regardless, who knows?  Bad teams are unpredictable.  I see the first round of the draft going this way: 1.  NY Giants (Saints and Colts are winnable games on schedule-but the Giants will be underdogs in both; predicted finish is 2-15) 2. Patriots  (not winning another game--they have 4 to play; I am guessing 3-14 and they have a pretty weak SOS) 3.The Browns have 1 winnable game--@ Bengals, and the Cats will be favored.  I predict that Winston is going to Winston--final record---3-14.  SOS is weaker right now than Vegas 4. Raiders (Saints and Jags on schedule---A win would take Vegas out of the Ward/Sanders race.  I think they could win 1; probably finish 3-14 5. Panthers could surprise some folks--here is why:  They play Dallas at home and that is a possible win. They end the season at Tampa Bay--and then the last game of the season against the team that may have the division wrapped up---Atlanta.  If so, they will play their subs, but it seems Tampa won't go away. Atlanta and Tampa Bay are currently 6-6, but the Falcons will probably lose to Minnesota and Washington, ending 9-8.  Tampa has an easier schedule down the stretch, with probable wins against the Raiders, Cowboys, Panthers, and Saints.  I think they win 3 or 4 of these, and that would prevent Atlanta from resting starters. Predicted finish:  4-13 because I think the Panthers will win one because they are improving, but Dallas is their best hope for a win (at home).  It is possible that they do not win a game, but we are playing too well not to get a W in five chances. 6. NY Jets (Jax only winnable game left, but with Rogers, they could upset someone.  probable 4-13) 7. Titans have 3-4 winnable games left on the schedule; expect 2 wins)  probably finish 5-12 or so. 8. Jags have nothing but winnable games left--Titans x 2, Jets, Colts, and Raiders-Jax could run the table, but they won't.  With Mac Jones, they could actually get a boost.    Expect them to finish 5-12. TEAMS with 4 WINS Bengals the are the first 4-win team but they have 3 winnable games--they will finish 6-11 by winning 2 of 3 vs. Cleveland, Dallas, and Tennessee. The Saints (4 wins) have the Giants and Raiders left.  They win at least 5, probably finish 6-11 The Bears have 4 wins and with SF, Minn, Seattle, Green Bay, and Detroit left, they may be headed for an 11-game losing streak to end the season.  Yikes.  Predicted finish, 4-13 THE DRAMA:  1. NY Giants--Ward, QB Miami 2. New England (TRADE with LV Raiders)--Expect the phone to be ringing with Vegas on the line and they will throw a ton at the lucky Pats, making it impossible for them to say "no".  The Pats have needs at Edge, WR, OL, and CB--so they will want picks. However, if they trade, they probably lose Travis Hunter, so the price will be steep, and the Raiders will pay it to bring in a brash star to be the QB of the future. 3.  Cleveland --With both QBs off the board, the Browns take the best player in the draft, Travis Hunter, CB/WR. 4.  New England (from Raiders)--Hard to say, but they will be focused on Edge, CB, WR, and maybe OL.  I am guessing they take the position that will be gone by round 2.  A. Carter, DE/Edge 5.  Carolina:  With the top WR in the draft on the board, along with Graham, the top DT, I do not see an edge or WR worth this pick.  I think they trade or they take Graham DT or McMillan WR.  We need a #1 WR, and we are getting DT Brown back, so the choice is a toss up.  If it were me, I would 1) trade back 5-10 spots and get both Edge and WR, 2) Graham, DT (can you imagine how awesome our front would be with Graham and Brown?) 3) McMillan WR.   My pick is Graham, DT, Michigan.  I think an edge like Boston College's Donovan Ezeirukau (80 tackles, 17 sacks) or a WR I really like--Elic Ayomanor from Stanford.   My sleeper pick is Mike Green (edge, Marshall).  Since Ayomanor is not a #1, I would take Exeirukau (BC Edge)  That is how I see it now--but we should be picking around #5, and we know 3 players that are going off the board 1-3--Hunter, Ward, and Sanders. 
    • Woods and Corbett  and Thomas will all be a UFAs
×
×
  • Create New...