Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About that run defense


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Evero better have a plan to stop Barkley and the Eagles rushing attack. I don’t care if he has to put 11 in the box, there’s nothing more demoralizing than having a team rush for more than 200 yards on you. I would rather take my chances with Jalen Hurts even if he throws for 500 yards. 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saquon will inch way closer to breaking the season rush record after this game. He’s licking his chops. 
that or in typical panther fashion, we’ll contain him but allow some scrub WR on their team to get 100+ yards and 3 TDs

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NAS said:

Evero better have a plan to stop Barkley and the Eagles rushing attack. I don’t care if he has to put 11 in the box, there’s nothing more demoralizing than having a team rush for more than 200 yards on you. I would rather take my chances with Jalen Hurts even if he throws for 500 yards. 

If a soft zone can't stop it then that's about all of Evero's solutions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Evero will try to have a plan but I'm still not sure how we're going to stop it with our defensive personnel currently. Their strengths match our weaknesses very well and it might be an ugly one if it gets out of hand early. I don't forsee us running the ball any better than we did against TB either, but maybe I'm wrong. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, scratched said:

At this point, I'm not it's Evero. Not to say he isn't partly to blame, but at some point it's about having the jimmys and joes to make the plays. And right now, I'm sure we have enough of those. 

It’s partly to blame but even last year we sucked against the run due to his scheme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...