Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shout out to the Nat'l media


CamWhoaaCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's great and all, but those of us who have been around a long time know not to put stock in or care what the national media and narrative is surrounding this team.

There's going to be flashes where they love us and periods of time where they hate us and a lot of time where they completely ignore us.

For the most part, none of it is due to actually knowing what is actually going on here. And the same is true for half the league.

National media is fickle and they turn the narratives on a dime when they care to even pay attention.

What you'll come to learn....maybe...is that the national media is always talking out of their ass. Good or bad narratives, they talk out of their ass.

It's best not to care what they say. Trust your own eyes and don't look to the national narrative for validation.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

That's great and all, but those of us who have been around a long time know not to put stock in or care what the national media and narrative is surrounding this team.

There's going to be flashes where they love us and periods of time where they hate us and a lot of time where they completely ignore us.

For the most part, none of it is due to actually knowing what is actually going on here. And the same is true for half the league.

National media is fickle and they turn the narratives on a dime when they care to even pay attention.

What you'll come to learn....maybe...is that the national media is always talking out of their ass. Good or bad narratives, they talk out of their ass.

It's best not to care what they say. Trust your own eyes and don't look to the national narrative for validation.

I know the Nat'l media is fickle. Still it's refreshing to finally here them say some good things about us. Even if we are losing games we are least making them competitive. It's good that they are at least noticing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of them are just trying to vindicate themselves for salivating over Bryce at draft time. He’s had a couple average games with a couple of above average plays and they’ve seized the opportunity to ride the lightning while it strikes. Like lightning, though, I see the hype as short-lived. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I know the Nat'l media is fickle. Still it's refreshing to finally here them say some good things about us. Even if we are losing games we are least making them competitive. It's good that they are at least noticing that.

Yes, it is nice. I just wouldn't expect it regardless of how we're doing. Id almost rather they didn't pay attention to us at all. That way when things come together and it all clicks (which it will), no one sees us coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the only time they’ll give us love, play well but lose.  Just the way they like it.  Small market means small ratings.  They hate it when we’re good and they have to talk about us instead of NY/LA/Dallas.  It just chaps their collective asses.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...