Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious question: Jameis Winston or Bryce Young straight-up?

HardcoreHokie

By HardcoreHokie,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted

Right now?  Probably Jameis, but his turnovers make it a hard choice.  Very hard to win games when you turn it over at the rate that he does, so depending on the team you might prefer someone who can manage the game as Bryce has been doing.

If I was a team like the Lions I'd probably prefer Bryce.  Just manage the game, don't try and be crazy.  Jameis can't do that, that isn't who eh is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HardcoreHokie Mentor

HardcoreHokie

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Who you got?

I want Bryce and Jameis (or similar, Hendon Hooker, Dalton, rookie, etc) competing in preseason for the starting gig.  

Nothing given, gotta earn it for Bryce.  He needs competition, he’s never really had that in his young life.  

Compete, get benched, get back up, be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HardcoreHokie Mentor

HardcoreHokie

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

If Bryce keeps playing at the level he is, I don't think he's going to need to compete. But I'm expecting a bit of a come down...

He needs to compete.  That’s why he got better, he got benched.  He’s never been benched in his life and it was a shock to him. It’s been handed to him.

Bring someone legit in and make him honestly earn it.  It’ll make him better if nothing else. And the team.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...