Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF names Panthers QB Bryce Young the best deep passer


pantherclaw
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, trucpfan said:

Arm is weak? Another useless complaint who gives a flying f… if he makes all the throws accurately idgaf about arm strength. Let’s dive deeper into your complaint no zip on the ball show me a play where his lack of zip cost us anything. Show me a play where his weak arm cost us a completion or because he doesn’t have a Josh Allen cannon he didn’t make the play he needed to make. His 40 yarder down the field to XL two weeks ago was a got d…. dime his throw to AT in the end zone was a dime, his throw to XL 3 weeks ago that the man pulled out his hand was a dime about 30+ yards. What about the one handed grab to AT was a rocket arm needed? You’re logic is so self absorbed your judging the man off what you want him to have and that’s just outright goofy, not judging him off performance not off the talent he’s going against not even the situation he’s facing ex..(4th quarter down by 4 needed a TD) in which he’s outperformed all expectations vs KC vs Giants vs Tampa nobody Gives a f…. about him not having a rocket he’s noodle arm in the last 4-5 weeks has him rated as top 3 QB I think that’s way more Important then satisfying fans need for our QB to possess a cannon these complaints are getting too notch outlandish and quite embarrassing go be a dam Bills fan so your QB can have the strongest arm in the league yet he’s won nothing significant since he’s been in the dam league besides your heart he’s won your heart by having a rocket arm we gotta see what’s his consolation prize for winning arm of the year award.

This is just dumb they benched him to help him because he has all the tools but wasn’t playing up to par benched him he  focused on his technique and came back and started doing what was expected what crow would they even be eating this is ignorant.

I see comprehension isn't strong for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly am I supposed to be eating crow about? Obviously the benching helped...it was needed. but if that never happened it was a good chance bryce was on his way out the league. Canales saved his career and you actually had fans and the media who blasted Canales for WEEKS for even having the audacity to make that move and were indirectly pushing  him to throw bryce back in asap but now you want crow eaten?  Lol....yeah okay.

Edited by CPF4LIFE
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's not even getting to the discussion of that this kid has finally shown some sort of consistency after almost 2 years of being in the league. We dedicated an entire off season of team construction and money spent on him just so we could get to this point or you might as well say sample size of what he can actually give us after a full season of let down and the stans are already marching around wanting crow...I would do yourself a favor and put that crow on the shelf sit back and continue to observe bryces progress for now because it's not out the woodwork you wont be the one eating it. Lol

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arm strength has always been overrated.

But Bryce's arm was also not as bad as it looked last year - he just had terrible mechanics / footwork.

He's come a LONG way. Actually, his raw arm strength isn't bad at all, as we see when he's throwing balls on the move. But prior to his benching, he didn't seem to have his mechanics down consistently enough to really drive the ball.

As to eating crow, plenty of fans thought the KC game was an anomaly. With a second good game, I'm interested to see if he can make it three in a row - especially against a MUCH tougher opponent. Here's hoping!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

And that's not even getting to the discussion of that this kid has finally shown some sort of consistency after almost 2 years of being in the league. We dedicated an entire off season of team construction and money spent on him just so we could get to this point or you might as well say sample size of what he can actually give us after a full season of let down and the stans are already marching around wanting crow...I would do yourself a favor and put that crow on the shelf sit back and continue to observe bryces progress for now because it's not out the woodwork you wont be the one eating it. Lol

Yes building a strong Oline only benefits Bryce 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I see comprehension isn't strong for you. 

lol that’s funny you say that i directly responded to the statement the coaches should eat crow to. Like Im confused about where your signals got crossed but I can clear things up for you since you failed to respond to what a stronger arm gets you, in the first paragraph where I asked what would a per say a 97mph fast ball Jameis W type of strong arm what  does that get you? I’m still waiting on that response but my statement was clear you said the coaches should eat crow.

My response 

” this is just dumb they benched him to help him because he has all the tools but wasn’t playing up to par benched him he  focused on his technique and came back and started doing what was expected what crow would they even be eating this is ignorant.”

Eating crow is when you’re wrong or you’ve been proven wrong wtf was Canales wrong about? He benched him because he wasn’t preforming up to the standard that he thought could. He then got another chance due to injury and did what was needed, next outing a better performance showing signs of improvement. Followed it up with a good game he’s been on a very short leash eat week because the coach hadn’t seen Bryce be consistently good. Asked about his starting performance vs KC coach says his play is answering the questions we all have. Where in the benching did he say or do anything that we would say dam coach was wrong about that he should be eating crow? Mr comprehension, I broke it down for you so you can’t wiggle out of giving regular response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPF4LIFE said:

What exactly am I supposed to be eating crow about? Obviously the benching helped...it was needed. but if that never happened it was a good chance bryce was on his way out the league. Canales saved his career and you actually had fans and the media who blasted Canales for WEEKS for even having the audacity to make that move and were indirectly pushing  him to throw bryce back in asap but now you want crow eaten?  Lol....yeah okay.

And then I read this you’re sounding wilder each response but if….did you say but if…but if I didn’t miss my parlay by one this weekend I would have made 10k off 100 dollars what does that even mean?? But If Bryce had solid protection to start his career he’d be playing like a top 10-12 QB this year. But If he had better weapons right now we’d be talking about 350 yards and 3 tds a game. But you or no one in the world can but if….. but if I didn’t cash out my bitcoin 4 years ago I’d be a millionaire today how dumb do I sound lol let’s not be silly I’m trying to have a half decent conversation about football with real deal fans and you’re hollering BUT IF…. Man knock it off you can say any dam thing with BUT IF like umm….but if the referee called Cotchery catch correctly we win the superbowl lol how do I sound doing your BUT IF…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an NFL sports story recently featuring the Washington Redskins of long ago. The story (part below) told how Redskins QB Billy Kilmer excelled even though his pass resembled a "Wounded Duck" which showed there was a lot more to being a good NFL QB than shear passing ability.

( "Redskins Manager George Allen wanted Billy Kilmer because of his “grittiness, toughness and smarts.” ).

( "One Redskin QB, Sonny Jurgensen would throw precise spiral passes deep to Charlie Taylor, or work the sideline for 1st downs then hit Jerry Smith in the end zone.")

(" When the Redskins other Redskin QB, Billy Kilmer threw a pass it resembled a “Wounded Duck,” all wobbly most of the time. But Billy was a competitor and a winner and finished as one of the 70 Greatest Redskins.")

Edited by KatsAzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

Arm strength has always been overrated.

But Bryce's arm was also not as bad as it looked last year - he just had terrible mechanics / footwork.

He's come a LONG way. Actually, his raw arm strength isn't bad at all, as we see when he's throwing balls on the move. But prior to his benching, he didn't seem to have his mechanics down consistently enough to really drive the ball.

As to eating crow, plenty of fans thought the KC game was an anomaly. With a second good game, I'm interested to see if he can make it three in a row - especially against a MUCH tougher opponent. Here's hoping!

Personally, I think he played well in the Aints and Giants games.  Against the Saints, he did what he was asked by the staff to do.  Didn't turn the ball over (leggette was responsible for the one int) and made play when he needed to.  Same with the Giants.  For this season, I don't think we need to see 300 yard 3 td games.  Eventually yes, but for now just giving us a shot to win by making plays and not turning the ball over is enough (for now).  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...