Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF names Panthers QB Bryce Young the best deep passer


pantherclaw
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I guess the coaching staff should eat crow too. The fans weren't the ones that benched him.

Difference is the coaching staff never said he couldn't do it and gave up on him. Some people here were so convinced he couldn't even compete on an NFL field. Especially the deep ball and the huddles perceived lack of ability to throw it, which has been talked about ad nauseum. I mean how many pictures of him standing next to someone, wearing a backpack, comparisons of his arms between seasons did we see? All to discredit his ability to be out there. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jfra78 said:

I never thought that he couldn't throw it deep, just that he doesn't. He has been more willing to push the ball downfield, and i like what I've seen recently. I still think his arm is weak, meaning he has no zip on the ball, but if he can continue to make up for it with anticipation then he will be ok.

Arm is weak? Another useless complaint who gives a flying f… if he makes all the throws accurately idgaf about arm strength. Let’s dive deeper into your complaint no zip on the ball show me a play where his lack of zip cost us anything. Show me a play where his weak arm cost us a completion or because he doesn’t have a Josh Allen cannon he didn’t make the play he needed to make. His 40 yarder down the field to XL two weeks ago was a got d…. dime his throw to AT in the end zone was a dime, his throw to XL 3 weeks ago that the man pulled out his hand was a dime about 30+ yards. What about the one handed grab to AT was a rocket arm needed? You’re logic is so self absorbed your judging the man off what you want him to have and that’s just outright goofy, not judging him off performance not off the talent he’s going against not even the situation he’s facing ex..(4th quarter down by 4 needed a TD) in which he’s outperformed all expectations vs KC vs Giants vs Tampa nobody Gives a f…. about him not having a rocket he’s noodle arm in the last 4-5 weeks has him rated as top 3 QB I think that’s way more Important then satisfying fans need for our QB to possess a cannon these complaints are getting too notch outlandish and quite embarrassing go be a dam Bills fan so your QB can have the strongest arm in the league yet he’s won nothing significant since he’s been in the dam league besides your heart he’s won your heart by having a rocket arm we gotta see what’s his consolation prize for winning arm of the year award.

1 hour ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I guess the coaching staff should eat crow too. The fans weren't the ones that benched him.

This is just dumb they benched him to help him because he has all the tools but wasn’t playing up to par benched him he  focused on his technique and came back and started doing what was expected what crow would they even be eating this is ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was never that Bryce had a weak arm. He just didn't take enough deep shots. And again, he was overthrowing guys. Not underthrowing them. Sure, a little more arc on the ball would have helped his receivers, but we don't have a real deep threat receiver. The closest was Chark last year but his hands were iffy at best. Timing was more of the reason for those misses than lack of arm strength. And that's mostly due to the room for error throwing deep to guys that aren't deep threat receivers. Mingo, TMJ, Thielen and Coker are not deep threat receivers. That doesn't mean they'll never catch a ball 30+ yards downfield. But it'll take a little more to get it done with them. Legette could be. But his hands are holding him back right now - like Chark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jfra78 said:

I never thought that he couldn't throw it deep, just that he doesn't. He has been more willing to push the ball downfield, and i like what I've seen recently. I still think his arm is weak, meaning he has no zip on the ball, but if he can continue to make up for it with anticipation then he will be ok.

He doesn't have elite arm strength but he does have good arm strength with elite arm flexibility. Mahomes is the only freak with both. Bryce is dropping some nice passes from less than ideal arm angles. And plenty of zip when he wants to. I do think he's still figuring out when to put some mustard on it and when to leave some room for error for his receivers. That's more timing and chemistry in my opinion. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jfra78 said:

I never thought that he couldn't throw it deep, just that he doesn't. He has been more willing to push the ball downfield, and i like what I've seen recently. I still think his arm is weak, meaning he has no zip on the ball, but if he can continue to make up for it with anticipation then he will be ok.

IMHO accuracy and anticipation > arm strength. JaMarcus Russell had arm strength for days but 0 accuracy and anticipation. Now you do need some arm strength but arm strength means squat if you don't know where to properly put it. 

Football is a game of inches

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...