Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Weeks 9-13 top passing grades

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Tbe said:

He’s also has the 3rd most drops this season.

I hate to say that I was right about Young, because I wasn't.  I stayed loyal through the offseason, but after the second game, I wanted him released or traded for a conditional seventh rounder. If this continues, I will admit that I have no ability to gauge a QBs expectations in the NFL.  None.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

So all of a sudden everyone on here loves PFF now? you damn hypocrites I'm disgusted 

 

I still don't care unless I have no clue who the player is. I watch all the Panthers game and still check your threads about scores, good for a laugh nearly always. 

Guy with 3 snaps- #1- 88.00

Jewell was all over the place and got a 40 something score, total joke. 

 

I place it along side a random huddles opinion. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_1741.jpeg.ea5a74333ed53bbd86360f5dfb8a2085.jpeg

The Panthers do rank dead last in receiver grade for the season which is very believable 

Man throw out Sean Payton and that’s an incredible correlation between WR efficiency and record. I know we want to hit defense hard, but getting TMac really should be our first pick. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ClawOn Grand Master

ClawOn

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I hate to say that I was right about Young, because I wasn't.  I stayed loyal through the offseason, but after the second game, I wanted him released or traded for a conditional seventh rounder. If this continues, I will admit that I have no ability to gauge a QBs expectations in the NFL.  None.

I, too, clearly have no business in a front office.   Couldn't be happier to be (more and more likely) wrong.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, rayzor said:

One thing I've noticed is now when it looks like a defense is getting ready to blitz on BY I get excited. Seems like he absolutely thrives when blitzed.

It actually makes sense if his little pentium is half of what it was billed as. The fast reads and throws vs blitzes are one of the reasons I'm so excited about him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ClawOn said:

I, too, clearly have no business in a front office.   Couldn't be happier to be (more and more likely) wrong.  

We do have some Huddlers, however, who are burdened with the pressure of always being right. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

It actually makes sense if his little pentium is half of what it was billed as. The fast reads and throws vs blitzes are one of the reasons I'm so excited about him 

Tom Brady talks about this a lot. It’s unreal to hear him talk about pre snap identification and the scenarios he sets up for after the snap. Not to compare bryce to the goat, but if he can be 80% of Brady in the head he will be just fine in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...