Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Weeks 9-13 top passing grades


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

My goodness he’s passing the eye test but these metrics make me tip my cap to the young man he’s done what he supposed to as the number one pick he’s progressed tremendously in a short time span. He’s playing like he just got comfortable playing QB and it’s really impressive to see him grow before our eyes especially with the abundance on negativity that we all (myself included) threw at him. Ol Tepper sitting back like I told these mutha….. loll.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Is it possible to include week 8 so that it includes the Denver game so we can have all games post benching 

The last 2 weeks he has 9 big time throws versus 1 turnover worthy throw 

I am sure it is I got this off Twitter, if someone has a subscription to PFF to pull it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

And despite our whining about XL, he isn't even close to the league lead in drops or drop percentage and he feels like our worst culprit (tho maybe Moore is worse lol)

https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/nfl/nfl-teams-with-most-dropped-passes-this-season-bm10/
 

So this link says we had 15 dropped passes according to football reference after week 12

Now I just went to football reference and it has us at 16 dropped passes. So that means they’re saying we only had 1 drop yesterday which simply isn’t true 

IMG_1737.thumb.jpeg.0d9b47a3883529532643b73d43d03665.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...