Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sometimes the deal you don’t make is the BEST DEAL…. LOL @ Giants


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

With 6 sacks (ranked 24) 

Burns looks like a bust and that’s with Lawrence and Thibedaux he still can’t put up monster numbers

 

 kudos to Morgan

Hunt>>>>>>>>>Burns

Kudos to Morgan? I’d give him kudos if he didn’t agree with Fitterer to not trade him to the Rams. He made lemonade from the lemon, but we were offered filet mignon.

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Kudos to Morgan? I’d give him kudos if he didn’t agree with Fitterer to not trade him to the Rams. He made lemonade from the lemon, but we were offered filet mignon.

We don’t know what transpired there. That wasn’t Dan’s final call to make

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, uncfan888 said:

Nah the best deal would have been getting a haul of picks from the rams

Yup, unfortunately we usually are a day late and a dollar shot in these scenarios.  Sometimes we can get a deal done later on, but peak value has already diminished.

Burns is and always has been a one trick pony.  He's a speed rush guy.  That's his game and never developed it beyond that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheBigKat said:

We don’t know what transpired there. That wasn’t Dan’s final call to make

Sorry, but it’s been reported by Person that Dan was in agreement of passing on the trade. Souleman was the only dissenting voice, likely because no soon to be $30M non-QB ever gets that much. Even the awful GM Bill O’Brien paid less for Tunsil than what we turned down for Burns because the Texans got two picks back.

 

  • The D 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, yeah we should have taken the big offer but people act like that was right before we gave him to the NYG. It was a year and a half earlier wasn't it? They wanted him but then he played his leverage game.

We did the right thing for sure in moving him and saving the salary he'd cost. 

Also, I think he just bought himself journeyman status because they will cut him as soon as they can he has no history there and they have a new regime coming too. So it looks bleak for Mr Burns in NYC, he should have made us a good deal and stayed where he was valued. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants GM having a rough go at it.  His kid schooled him on what QB should get sought after in the draft and he basically laughed him off (Daniels in Washington).  Sold his owner no one would pay Barkley and certainly the Eagles wouldn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • If there's a prospect who looks strong on the field but has the question marks, makes sense to bring them in and see if they are indeed a nutjob or not.  Especially if they couldn't get a good sense in limited time to meet him at the combine.  Randy Mueller has talked about it before -- many GMs don't just use these top-30s to validate the guys they already love.  Although we seem to do that and kind of show our cards a lot lol.   But to the point, if they love tape, have met enough coaches/teammates and talked to them at the bowls/workouts, many teams don't need to wine and dine and get to know them.   There's certain guys who get to know regional scouts, GMs and position coaches starting mid-college season last year.    On the flipside, there's the wildcards who aren't privy to developing relationships with the pro-community while in school, have bad reps, and teams need to dig a bit further into it.  A top-30 becomes a good measuring stick for those teams think could be a stellar fit but are unsure on who the guy actually is - which matters a ton at the end of the day.  Organizational fit has so much more weight than let on and is why these drafts after the first few picks get so all over the map.  
×
×
  • Create New...