Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gameday Thread: KC-CAR


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mage said:

The DBs were playing off and we weren't playing aggressive at the LOS, which had been working on the earlier drives.  Chiefs OL was struggling, we should have kept attacking.  Instead we played conservatively.

And I mean, Mahomes is Mahomes.  So he's going to get his.  But I would have liked to see us keep playing as aggressive as we had been.

Goal was accomplished. We showed improvement and played tough. Winning would've been losing. We need moral victories and better draft position. Today was perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Like I've said, regardless of Bryce, we still don't have a #1 WR, XL's upside is a very good #2 on a good team.

Hunter and Burden are both slot WRs at the next level, not true outside #1's

T-Mac is the pick no matter what, he is exactly what this team needs and would give us a potentially elite pass catching group in a few years with T-Mac, XL, Coker, and Sanders.

You preaching brotha!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Yup, he protected the football and got a few passes down the field.  I still view him as a game manager at best.

He played better than what his average had been for the season which had been one of the worst qualified passers. There's nowhere to go but up from rock bottom. Credit to him for improving from that. But we still need to blow up this QB room and have a legitimate competition next year. If we want to truly take a step out of the cellar and become a serious franchise that's the only path forward.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yup, he protected the football and got a few passes down the field.  I still view him as a game manager at best.

Hey, I'm not saying he's our QB of the future. Personally, I'd trade him to the highest bidder.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Yea they called a facemask because a chiefs player gestured to the refs it was a facemask, despite it not being a facemask call. And then a legit PI on Horn who is easily having his worst game as a pro, and then more missed calls than anything else, openly allowing the Chiefs offensive line to hold. 

I saw a lot of holding all game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pdub0702 said:

You’re not wrong. Bryce impressed (not a big fan of him) but credit due. Draft defensive studs..team has a promising future 

Same here. This is probably only the second game that I can say I would truly impressed with the way he played. Hopefully he will make me eat crow and be this good for the rest of his career for us. 

There are a few freak athlete talent edge rushers in the draft. Since I doubt we get Travis Hunter, that should be the way we go

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

When he was playing bad yes. That’s what happens when you react with your eyes and not your petty ass emotion. Stop quoting me. You’re an idiot. 

Creating not one but two threads declaring him a bust is by definition petty and emotional. If you want to pretend none of it happened that's your prerogative but constantly crowing about haters and calling others idiots is delusional at best. I hope you have a nice evening sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...