If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

[MHS831]

7 hours ago, strato said:

Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know.

I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it. 

Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that.

So I went and looked, again. Well, well. 

For everyone:

"When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated.

When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation."

It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from:

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/

As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year. 

The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.

I saw that too--and what you said made sense because there is something like that in the rules--said that he is unlikely to get picked up (and I was not suggesting that we do) and Jones wants to go to a winning team.   After getting beaten to death in NY behind a sub par OL, poor WRs, and brutal fan base, I get it. 

[Mr. Scot]

On 11/22/2024 at 11:41 AM, Doc Holiday said:

Hard pass, He’ll go down forever as one of the most puzzling contracts I’ve ever seen given out.

That contract is gonna be a massive albatross around Joe Schoen's neck.

[Mr. Scot]

As to bringing in Jones, this idea feels like Sam Darnold Part Deux

[Icege]

Pantherscord member that used to post breakdowns here (can't remember their username on the Huddle) made an interesting point: Signing Jones and then letting him walk at the end of the season could potentially lead to another comp pick...

Edited 37 minutes ago by Icege

[mrcompletely11]

3 minutes ago, Icege said:

Pantherscord member that used to post breakdowns here (can't remember their username on the Huddle) made an interesting point: Signing Jones and then letting him walk at the end of the season could potentially lead to another comp pick...

I think shefter reported as well

https://atozsports.com/nfl/baltimore-ravens-news/ravens-reported-interest-in-daniel-jones-has-an-obvious-reason-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-this-season/

 

If the Ravens add Jones on a one-year deal, it will expire at the conclusion of the 2024-25 league year in March and he'd become an unrestricted free agent. Jones could then sign with another team, and the last team he would've played for would be Baltimore.

In short, the Ravens would be eligible to receive a 2026 compensatory pick for Jones signing with another team next year. 

[Icege]

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I think shefter reported as well

https://atozsports.com/nfl/baltimore-ravens-news/ravens-reported-interest-in-daniel-jones-has-an-obvious-reason-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-this-season/

 

If the Ravens add Jones on a one-year deal, it will expire at the conclusion of the 2024-25 league year in March and he'd become an unrestricted free agent. Jones could then sign with another team, and the last team he would've played for would be Baltimore.

In short, the Ravens would be eligible to receive a 2026 compensatory pick for Jones signing with another team next year. 

Damn, that'd be a steal for the Ravens. Diontae AND Daniel signed as depth pieces for the postseason run only to let them walk for comp picks afterwards? Rich getting richer.