Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS Sports: Daniel Jones as a potential option for the Panthers to consider.

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You are expecting people to simply throw out his past performance because you think he has the tools and was in a bad situation.  We get it.  Thats laughable and if my posting of his stats is insulting then put me on ignore.  His stats are his stats and that motherfuger has no business playing for this franchise.  We are past the point of reclamation projects.  And if you are not using past data as an indicator for future performance then there is simply no helping you

Your problem is you focus on the person making the comment more than the fact that an opinion is just that--to call someone names where there is no correct answer, as much as you don't understand that, is juvenile.  So if I explain how stocks that have terrible track records are purchased for pennies on the dollar--that is because the company has good fundamentals and is projected to grow if the sector indicators change.  That is science--and it is NOT based on prior performance.  I even said you do not put all your eggs in this basket--it is part of the process because it is low risk, high reward if it works out.  I will provide another example:  In Charlotte, they offered high performing teachers from South Charlotte a $20K bonus to transfer to the most challenging West Charlotte schools.  These high-performing teachers struggled--most retired or resigned--did they forget how to teach?.  Yet the teachers from West Charlotte Title I schools were dramatically improved in South Charlotte classrooms, most averaging increased test scores by over 50 points--unreal "growth."   The Giants are one of those challenging schools.  Jones is one of those teachers with low test scores who moves to South Charlotte to teach.  So my point was you cannot rely on the stats from a hostile, negative environment to evaluate quality.  Is Rogers changing the world in NY?  Hell no.  Did he suddenly suck?  This concept requires an understanding of social and emotional impact on player development.  Jones has the skills to be good.  I am sorry you have to simplify everything to understand it.  If we sign Jones on the cheap and he sucks and we cut him, what have we lost?  If he feeds off the better OL and Running game and reaches his potential, we win.  Low Risk, High Reward.  It is a business decision--not some psychotic defending a loser--which makes it easy for you to attack.  If you don't understand the discussions in the gray area, I guess you might attack the person with an opinion that reflects what other teams and players have done successfully.  Not my job to educate you.  Sue your public schools for malpractice because they did not teach you to think critically and objectively.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Your problem is you focus on the person making the comment more than the fact that an opinion is just that--to call someone names where there is no correct answer, as much as you don't understand that, is juvenile.  So if I explain how stocks that have terrible track records are purchased for pennies on the dollar--that is because the company has good fundamentals and is projected to grow if the sector indicators change.  That is science--and it is NOT based on prior performance.  I even said you do not put all your eggs in this basket--it is part of the process because it is low risk, high reward if it works out.  I will provide another example:  In Charlotte, they offered high performing teachers from South Charlotte a $20K bonus to transfer to the most challenging West Charlotte schools.  These high-performing teachers struggled--most retired or resigned--did they forget how to teach?.  Yet the teachers from West Charlotte Title I schools were dramatically improved in South Charlotte classrooms, most averaging increased test scores by over 50 points--unreal "growth."   The Giants are one of those challenging schools.  Jones is one of those teachers with low test scores who moves to South Charlotte to teach.  So my point was you cannot rely on the stats from a hostile, negative environment to evaluate quality.  Is Rogers changing the world in NY?  Hell no.  Did he suddenly suck?  This concept requires an understanding of social and emotional impact on player development.  Jones has the skills to be good.  I am sorry you have to simplify everything to understand it.  If we sign Jones on the cheap and he sucks and we cut him, what have we lost?  If he feeds off the better OL and Running game and reaches his potential, we win.  Low Risk, High Reward.  It is a business decision--not some psychotic defending a loser--which makes it easy for you to attack.  If you don't understand the discussions in the gray area, I guess you might attack the person with an opinion that reflects what other teams and players have done successfully.  Not my job to educate you.  Sue your public schools for malpractice because they did not teach you to think critically and objectively.

Jesus h christ dude

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, travisura said:

This franchise has a pathological aversion to drafting/signing Clemson players. Never drafted one, and the signings are once in a blue moon, and they're never high profile guys.

But their fans simp for their players left and right. Regardless of how ill suited to the NFL they typically are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • theinstrumental
      As of today, who would you draft at number 8?

      By theinstrumental · Posted

      Jahdae Barron. Bringing plus physicality at a position where it’s normally scarce is an impactful swing. He’s going to help the character of whatever defense he’s on. I’d prefer a d-lineman, but there likely isn’t one worth 8, and there are so many in the middle rounds. Just get a dude who helps.
    • KatsAzz
      BRYCE YOUNG SUSPENDED "PEDS"

      By KatsAzz · Posted

      You got me on the April Fool Joke. 🙂
    • MHS831
      As of today, who would you draft at number 8?

      By MHS831 · Posted

      1.  Edge Jalon Walker:  I have been skeptical of Walker's fit as I would be any hybrid type of player, but his strengths as a person and player and the flexibility he gives the DC is formidable. He gives us a LB who can covert to Edge or Edge who can convert to LB during "hurry up" offenses when you can't substitute.  Walker scares me, but you don't draft him if you can't see the fit.  At #8, we could do worse.  I am seeing more Micah Parsons than I did a week ago.  2.  CB Will Johnson: Too often we think of the third CB as depth or nickel because that is traditional thought.  In today's NFL, it is common to have 3 CBs on the field since the NFL has gone to 11 personnel --3 WRs, 1 TE--65% of the time, up from 55% in 2010; and if we have an injury to Horn or Jackson, there is not a lot we can do).  With Johnson and Horn on the outside and Jackson on the third WR, our secondary is solid, preventing us from having to cover the third WR with a S, who would be assigned to TEs instead. 3.  TE Tyler Warren:   The only way I take Warren is if I plan to use him as a multi-dimensional offensive weapon.   He would give the Panthers an elite TE (when we have been good, we have had an elite TE and an elite ILB) and lessen the need to reach for a WR by giving Young a shiny new weapon.  There are a lot of teams who like Warren, so if he is still on the board, watch a team like the Rams try to trade up.  With Sanders as an option in a 2 TE set and depth, we would have a pretty good TE room. Chris Simms recently said Warren would be better than Brock Bowers.   Well.... In five years:  Warren finished his five-year college career with 1,839 yards, 153 receptions and 25 total touchdowns.  In three years:  Bowers in three years at Georgia finished with 2,538 yards, 175 receptions and 31 total touchdowns.
×
×
  • Create New...