Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina may not "be sold" on young (per athletic)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, countryboi said:

Man this is the same speculation that was posted like three days ago. It’s basically an article quoting an article. They not be sold on Bryce but this article ain’t talking about nothing. 
 

That’s said Nothing makes me wanna throw up more than an idea of drafting another first round quarterback but I also understand this was not Morgan’s pick. 

We honestly don't have much evidence what Morgan really thought about the Bryce move. For all we know, he was all in.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

We honestly don't have much evidence what Morgan really thought about the Bryce move. For all we know, he was all in.

Bryce and CJ were pretty much 1a and 1b it’s completely possible he was all in. Hell, I was all in. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Fields would be a bad idea if you are bringing him in to start. Unless we want to run the triple option.

Ward I don't think will be available when we are picking. 

I wouldn't HATE the pick but he is a pretty wild gunslinger type. Could be Winston, could be Mahomes.

Doesn't have the deep ball accuracy of either of those guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team is going to throw a bunch of money at Sam Darnold and the Huddle is going to explode. Memes aside I actually think Darnold would fit really well in Canales's scheme if we are able to get another playmaker at WR and some help on the defense we could be pretty solid with Darnold at QB. 

Edited by CmC2k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We honestly don't have much evidence what Morgan really thought about the Bryce move. For all we know, he was all in.

Or at least he wasn't strong enough in his convictions to resign when we did select Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, frankw said:

Morgan and Fitterer were best friends. Any assumption that they were remotely at odds over Bryce Young is only one that can be made out of copium at this point.

Y’all have this weird assumption that, because Morgan and Fitt were close, he had to agree with every decision Fitt made. Do you agree with every decision your boss makes?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

We honestly don't have much evidence what Morgan really thought about the Bryce move. For all we know, he was all in.

Or all out depending on what you want to believe 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Morgan and Fitterer were best friends. Any assumption that they were remotely at odds over Bryce Young is only one that can be made out of copium at this point.

This is an assumption that holds as much weight as any other assumption here.

I don't share many if any opinions with my best friends who have generally been long time coworkers who own the company. It's their ship not mine even as lesser % partner.

 

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, countryboi said:

Y’all have this weird assumption that, because Morgan and Fitt were close, he had to agree with every decision Fitt made. Do you agree with every decision your boss makes?

 

1 hour ago, csx said:

This is an assumption that holds as much weight as any other assumption here.

I don't share many if any opinions with my best friends who have generally been long time coworkers who own the company. It's their ship not mine even as lesser % partner.

Morgan was not his glorified secretary he was the assistant GM. He also kept the draft scouts basically entirely intact. If he were steadfast against some of the things Fitterer was doing in relation to the draft in particular he would have cleaned house from the go.

If you want to take the glass half full perspective on it that's perfectly fine but let's not bs one another on this if one of our rivals fired their worst GM in franchise history just to turn around and replace him with his right hand man you'd be cracking jokes. The reason Morgan gets the benefit of the doubt is former Panther status. That's fine but it doesn't change what he was part of these last few years. Nothing wrong with acknowledging that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...