Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales still not sold on Bryce?


 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Thing is Andy was already here. Drew had a full off-season&season with Daves system and others coaches helping.

I got not clue how Drew would do here, there's barely any in-game snaps and Ive never seen him in a practice setting. 

He should be NFL QB "cheap", that's one of the biggest reasons cause panthers barley have any cap space. Plus it seemed the staff when after him, but lots changes in a NFL year. Dave could be all-in on rookie to pair with this very young team. 

I'm not against it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Canales has the real say.  I think Bryce's benching after week 2 was Tepper (100%).  The only way to explain such a hard 180 after the Monday meeting from Sunday.   I think what to do going forward is Tepper......and that's why Canales forever struggles with basic questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don't think Canales has the real say.  I think Bryce's benching after week 2 was Tepper (100%).  The only way to explain such a hard 180 after the Monday meeting from Sunday.   I think what to do going forward is Tepper......and that's why Canales forever struggles with basic questions. 

Justin Timberlake Eye Roll GIF by Agent M Loves Gifs

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don't think Canales has the real say.  I think Bryce's benching after week 2 was Tepper (100%).  The only way to explain such a hard 180 after the Monday meeting from Sunday.   I think what to do going forward is Tepper......and that's why Canales forever struggles with basic questions. 

Not even Dan Snyder was that insane.

I am sure Dave had to pitch a case to Tepper in his weekly meeting but I don't think it was a hard sell. I am not sure it will be a tough sell to bench Bryce again, either.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Not even Dan Snyder was that insane.

I am sure Dave had to pitch a case to Tepper in his weekly meeting but I don't think it was a hard sell. I am not sure it will be a tough sell to bench Bryce again, either.

I am not even sure what to think anymore about this.  Canales would be insane to trot Dalton out there against the Chiefs but there is literally no point in not naming bryce the starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am not even sure what to think anymore about this.  Canales would be insane to trot Dalton out there against the Chiefs but there is literally no point in not naming bryce the starter. 

It doesn't really matter which one starts but the fact Canales doesn't say who's starting the next game is kinda odd. I'm not sure what the benefit is in not saying who's starting. The Chiefs will not have to change anything no matter who's behind center. Maybe he's still trying to convince Andy to start? I know I wouldn't want to be the sacrificial lamb to go against those guys.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I don't really care who is named the starter.  While its interesting to some to discuss it on a message board, I doubt it matters much in terms of results.    

I'm guessing the Chiefs are sitting starters after halftime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

They are not really a "blow you out" team this year. It might be closer than we thinking while also being comfortably out of reach.

I would say the put up 30 rather easily. We might be lucky to get 6. It will not be close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LeBron not getting enough attention he had to announce to the world he's leaving social media for the time being lol   This man about to be 40. This is kid like behavior and I'm a fan of LeBron. Cmon bro do better.
    • Does anyone else see this as the beginning of the end of Freddie Andersen? It started as a day-to-day. Escalated to week-to-week: Brind'Amour announced that Andersen was considered week-to-week with the injury. He said, "That's a little more time than I was hoping, but hopefully we'll get an update every week". Next: Brind'Amour later said that Andersen's injury would be "way longer" than expected. Now: https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/toronto-maple-leafs/latest-news/report-former-maple-leafs-goaltender-frederik-andersen-shut-down-by-hurricanes-to-miss-roughly-8-weeks-following-knee-surgery According to TSN's Pierre LeBrun, Andersen is set to undergo surgery that will keep him out of the team's lineup for "roughly" eight weeks. Who here believes the Canes will roll with Kochetkov and Martin without making a move?
    • Meniscus maybe? I can't see it being ligaments or he would be done for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...