Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

33rd Team has a mock out today


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

Trevin Wallace is a special teamer. He got knocked out yesterday by Daniel jones. I like him, but he’s limited. 

Jewell is about to turn 30, but he’s a smart player and i think he can play multiple positions 

Jewell is a fine player, Wallace is whatever, neither should have an impact on who the panthers draft for the front 7. 

Lmaoooo...oh poo I don't think i was paying attention when that happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

Best thing about Walker is he’s not done growing and has a big frame. He’ll make that physical jump between his first and second year. He has a good head on his shoulders.  

Worst part is he’ll be raw. Kirby’s defensive philosophy is getting the biggest, blackest, meanest players he can and just letting them go hog wild.

this kid will be ripping people in half year two. 

Lol...it sounds messed up but at the same time thats How you win in college football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Lol...it sounds messed up but at the same time thats How you win in college football. 

Saban was notable for really hammering technique in his players and frankly it made up for their physical limitations as the other schools caught up with his recruiting. 

Saban was a legit incredible coach, not just a recruiter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

I don't keep up with all the prospects. I just watch college ball to enjoy it and haven't watched ECU in a good while.

The best CB in the last draft was from Toledo(saw him play live in the MAC championship game). It really doesn't make any sense to assume the caliber of player based on school. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The worst team in the NFL takes a LB with their 1st Rd pick.

 

Yep sounds like something we would do. Sign me up!

Who are you suggesting or hoping for? Sanders is out because Deion wont allow it. Who else you got? TMAC probably out too when we finish with about 5 or 6 wins im guessing.

Edited by Ricky Prickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The best CB in the last draft was from Toledo(saw him play live in the MAC championship game). It really doesn't make any sense to assume the caliber of player based on school. 

It's ECU man. What have they won in the last decade? The papa johns bowl?

Edit: And it's not like ECU gets a lot of high profile players either

Edited by jayboogieman
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

The 3-4 was Dave's choice. We've never really had the players to run it effectively. 

That's how I remember it too. He "influenced" Ron Rivera to go that way before he fired him. It was a mistake. As you pointed out, we've never had to right players to effectively run that scheme week in and week out; especially against the better teams in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LB is a massive need. Unless they are in position to draft a top notch QB, they should consider it or even potentially trading down to get more picks. This team has holes up and down the roster in particular the defense. Which might have 2 or 3 guys which are guaranteed to be here next season. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Sanders/Hunter/Tmac/Ward

Anything outside those 4 would be a huge disappointment for me.

 

 

Id like Hunter for sure. I think he is a best fit for CB but would be nice to have a player that can do both. I have  a feeling we win anywhere from 2-3 more games and it knocks us out from all them unless one falls pretty far. Ward may fall but I dont know if we have the courage to draft a QB that high again for another season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...