Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Meanwhile, KC has to be about the worst 9-0 team ever. Somehow they're undefeated and haven't looked good yet. Something has to give. They're either gonna start playing better or they've gotta start losing some of these 50/50 games.

2 weeks in Carolina.  Gonna break up kelce/swift.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, frankw said:

The Bears got blown out by the Patriots and Caleb Williams finished with a YPA lower than Bryce Young. 4 yards per attempt lmfao. There is someone actually worse than our QB. Now THAT is something that is worth rejoicing over.

Trade Bryce and a 2nd for DJ Moore and Caleb Williams…and the Universe would re-align.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoenheim said:

THEN JALEN HURTS FUMBLES. COWBOYS NOW HAVE IT NEAR THEIR GOAL LINE
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Jalen Hurts holds the ball way to damn long even without the fumble that would have been the 3rd 10+ yard sack he took the eagles are idiots he also threw that pick from the on 2nd and goal from the five why not just run BARKLEY

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Jalen Hurts holds the ball way to damn long even without the fumble that would have been the 3rd 10+ yard sack he took the eagles are idiots he also threw that pick from the on 2nd and goal from the five why not just run BARKLEY

And it’s like the 4th time this half. He holds the ball forever in a pocket most QBs only dream of, then runs right into defenders. Dudes awareness is 0

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I didn't watch, but did he get sacked because he was extending plays, holding on to the ball to long, or were they getting thru before he had a chance to even set up?

I made myself suffer and watched that game's "highlights". Obviously couldn't get a full picture, but their tackles were iffy and the O-line generally did not hold up well whenever the Patriots brought pressure. Pass/run ratio also not good.  

Edited by outlaw4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...