Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs. Giants in München

Chief_Chokeaho
 Share

Recommended Posts

Johnstonny Veteran

Johnstonny

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean that would have been the pinnacle of Panthers luck to lose to the Giants and beat the Chiefs. It's literally about par for the course in the Tepper era.

It would never happen in 1000 years...would love to drank some bourbon with you though...

Edited by Johnstonny
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Bryce Young had 1 single touchdown with 126 passing yards and 5.0 YPA (good for the worst in the entire league amongst all qualified passers).

If they don't make a move for any other QB that is enough to ditch the franchise for the foreseeable future.

Would you want them to trade up?

3 wins still isn't too bad overall. That should still mean we get a top 10 pick. 

Getting a 4th win would fug us though. Might turn into a pick in the teens or mid rounds winning 4 or 5 games vs 3 games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrisbanePanther Mentor

BrisbanePanther

Posted
Posted

It's so weird to see the same crowd that agreed with benching the QB because of how he drags the other players and the locker room down...turn around and be upset at a win that the same locker room is probably happy about, ugly or not. This win makes the long plane ride from Munich and the bye week a lot better for the 53.

So do we care about the rest of the team or nah?

And FWIW, I was always pro-tank, but the guys in the locker room needed this. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chbright Mentor

chbright

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Picking high gives you a better opportunity to draft great players. But you still have to actually select the right one, which we suck at. 

the fact this is lost on so many is infuriating. all pick have risk its a given, but getting all the earliest picks you can means you get to set yourself with the best opportunity to get it right. we screwed up last time, royally. does not mean we will again. hell the texans showed what you can do with 2 early picks in 2023........

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeadpoolPanther Contributor

DeadpoolPanther

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

I missed OT, so we got a turnover and we didn't even try to score proper? Just set up for a field goal? I understand that wins the game but doesn't put a lot of confidence in your qb to do anything

Tbh 99% of every other team would’ve done the same thing. You get the ball in fg position and fg wins the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
uncfan888 Grand Master

uncfan888

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jackie Lee said:

I missed OT, so we got a turnover and we didn't even try to score proper? Just set up for a field goal? I understand that wins the game but doesn't put a lot of confidence in your qb to do anything

Most teams in that situation would run and then line up for the game winner. I don't think Canales trusts Bryce or has confidence in him but not because of that series

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Would you want them to trade up?

3 wins still isn't too bad overall. That should still mean we get a top 10 pick. 

Getting a 4th win would fug us though. Might turn into a pick in the teens or mid rounds winning 4 or 5 games vs 3 games.

 

No just stay where we are let the chips fall where they may. We've made our bed just have to roll with it no more trades.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swaggasaurus Community Regular

Swaggasaurus

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Champagnepapi704 said:

What the "ill take a win at any cost" fail to realize is it only hurts the team more in the long run 

Carry On Reaction GIF by Amazon Prime Video

I’d never root for the team to lose at this point in the season. You cannot evaluate your team in non competitive games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...