Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why are we wasting money on RBs? Not even 2 years and we overpaid for 2 RBs!

CamWhoaaCam

By CamWhoaaCam,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The top offense traded for a WR who is a FA after the season. Seems like they think he's a serious enough talent to put them over the top.

Johnson is a high end #2 WR. In the right situation he has #1 type ability. This guy already had a 1000 yard season earlier in his career. He's in his prime right now. For a team who lacks talent you damn right I wanted him on this roster long-term.

 

But he didn't want to be here so obviously you move on which we did.

Yeah they must have REALLY wanted him.  What did they give up for him??  Last I checked he was practicing punt returns...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I'm not mad just disappointed at the timing. We should have waited until we see what Brooks offered.

 

At worst it gives us options. That Chubba money could have been spent on a defensive starter. RBs are easy to find more than any other position. You can get them undrafted or late in the draft.

 

As for those teams with 2RBs you do notice their rosters are legit? We don't have that kind of roster to get wins right away. It only works when you have a roster full of talent. We are far from that.

Again Brooks playing well wasn't changing our opinion on Hubbard.  We want a 1, 2 punch. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Dude, the division-leading Falcons drafted an RB in the first. Arguably the best team in the NFC, also drafted one in the first not too long ago. We drafted one in the second with a likely first round grade notwithstanding an injury (one that some experts expressly said may be better than Bijan, who is better than Jahmyr). 

Some of you kill me with the RB thing. Yes, they have been devalued on paper---they're not going to get paid like other positions due to the nature of their positiom, but they're still as important as ever on the field.

Their contracts are still relatively paltry compared to most positions however, so it's not something to get all up in arms or start hand wringing about.

We just wasted money on a RB. You should learn from your mistakes. Everyone is acting like Chubba has been elite for years. This was his first elite season. He could fall off after the contract. You have to look at from both sides.

 

It makes people question the Brooks pick. Why are you selecting a RB that high only to pay another RB the same season. 2 backs is fine, but you're investing high picks and top 10 RB money for a position that isn't the most valuable.

 

The 2 back system wins you games when you have the roster. We don't have the roster right now so to think that will equal wins just because other teams produce wins is insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

There is an argument to be made that Morgan is not strikingly different from Fitterer in some ways and in one particular way Hurney with these significant investments in RB with signing both Hubbard and trading up for an injured Brooks in the draft.

If it works out great if it doesn't then it's going to be because everyone else in the league largely knows RB has become a more devalued position and operates as such going forward. The 49ers while McCaffrey was out had the league leading rusher who was undrafted.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Again Brooks playing well wasn't changing our opinion on Hubbard.  We want a 1, 2 punch. 

Chubba is now paid like a top 10 RB.

Brooks was the first RB off the board with a 2nd Rd pick.

 

Boy this better be a damn good duo moving forward or else we just wasted money and a valuable draft pick on 2 average RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, frankw said:

There is an argument to be made that Morgan is not strikingly different from Fitterer in some ways and in one particular way Hurney with these significant investments in RB with signing both Hubbard and trading up for an injured Brooks in the draft.

If it works out great if it doesn't then it's going to be because everyone else in the league largely knows RB has become a more devalued position and operates as such going forward. The 49ers while McCaffrey was out had the league leading rusher who was undrafted.

I like the way you think. I think some people are getting caught up in "he's a hard worker he deserves it". I'm not questioning if he deserves it. I'm just saying why are we investing high picks and top 10 RB money for 2 RBs.

 

The position itself is not very valuable. People screaming 2 backs wins you games. Yeah when you have the roster. We don't have the roster to win games with 2 backs.

 

Just seems like a signing that could have waited until we see what Brooks can bring to the table. Chubba money could have been a defensive starter money in FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scratched Rising Star

scratched

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Miles Trash Ass Sanders has already proven to be a fail.

 

Chubba is a hard worker, but giving him a big deal before we see what we have in Brooks who we happened to draft in the 2nd is just flat out dumb.

 

We currently have 3 RBs 2 are overpaid and a rookie who has yet to prove himself. All this money and investment for 3 RBs is insane.

 

 

Man they gotta start interviewing random people for the GM job. I swear some of these dudes just be doing anything as the GM. No thought process just making stupid decisions that sets the team back even more.

 

 

Let me hear it. I know the poo emojis coming but someone has to speak up for the voiceless!

 

What are we doing behind closed doors?

 

So what is your suggestion? Trade him for a 3rd or 4th rounder? Or sign another FA like Sanders? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Except we aren't a run first team

That’s the Only issue I have with this.

if we committed to the run more like Canales said when he took the job.  This signing shouldn’t even concern anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • *FreeFua*
      Bryce is still the future

      By *FreeFua* · Posted

      If the last 2 weeks were Young’s first games in the NFL I’d have been pretty content Its tough to forget those first 18 games but he finally did things these last 2 weeks I’ve been waiting 18 games to see So it’s a start  Dan Morgan doesn’t strike me as the chess type but the whole committed thing could just be him knowing we’re going to have a top 5 pick again and if Bryce continues to flirt with this whole improvement thing then you might as well ride this out into the draft and potentially get someone to pick a QB in front of you 
    • ForJimmy
      BREAKING:Panthers re-sign Chuba Hubbard

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      He is getting 8 million a year with only 15 guaranteed.  The Lions just drafted a RB in round 1 and then signed Montgomery and then threw more money at him.  There won't be many of these 3 down workhorses you are talking about, it will be a committees.  Our OC even said he had plays drawn up with both RBs in the backfield.  The starting DE you are getting for $8 probably shouldn't be a starting DE.  I'm not against paying a proven RB who is a locker room leader $8 million a year with our other RB being on a mid 2nd round contract.  That's pretty normal and nothing over the top for cap allocation.  You are still thinking old school.  The Falcons spent a high first on Robinson and he still splits with Allegier, The Lions spent a 1st on Gibbs and he splits with Montgomery not to mention injuries over a 17 game season.  
    • CamWhoaaCam
      Why are we wasting money on RBs? Not even 2 years and we overpaid for 2 RBs!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      And that's how we ended up with Miles Sanders. Paying for a RB who had 1 great season. Now that our RB position is good to go I hope we see some success in the win column.   2 back system is a proven system is what they told me. Can't wait to start winning more games with double trouble!
×
×
  • Create New...