Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Redskins will trade Jason Campbell for a "low pick" during the draft?


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

As much as you guys hated how the FO put all their eggs in one basket with Jake, they are apparently going to do the same with Matt. As the article stated, the FO doesn't want Matt looking over his shoulder and the very reason they got rid of Jake. In other words, we may bring in a veteran QB, just not one capable of overtaking Moore as the starter, leaving Campbell out of the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole "no competition" thing gets misapplied with Delhomme.

Work ethic was never the problem. He worked as hard as he could, regardless of whether anyone was behind him or not.

The notion that someone behind him would have made a difference just doesn't hold water.

Would it help Moore? Don't know. It's not a given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole "no competition" thing gets misapplied with Delhomme.

Work ethic was never the problem. He worked as hard as he could, regardless of whether anyone was behind him or not.

The notion that someone behind him would have made a difference just doesn't hold water.

Would it help Moore? Don't know. It's not a given.

Wasn't Fox reluctant to put Moore in because of low work ethic? I don't know, I just don't see how having a solid back up option is a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Current draft order NYG, NE, JAX, TN, CLE, LV, CAR. We need to ask ourselves "what is the biggest need of those teams heading into the draft"? And, "What positions do we know are not major needs for the teams above?" JAX is terrible, but we know they won't be drafting a QB. The Patriots won't be either. The Raiders and Giants definitely need a QB. The Browns have one under contract, but he's been terrible since they signed him. I could see all 3 of them eyeing QB's. Hunter is a wild card. He could be the first player taken. Or, he could slip because some teams may not want to deal with his insistence on playing both ways. A team with a bad O-line may want to go LT TMAC is going to appeal to a team that needs a playmaker at WR. If CB is major need, I could see Will Thomas (or Hunter) coming off the board prior to our selection at #7. It's possible that Graham could fall into our laps. Then again we haven't factored FA into the equation. A lot of these teams will lure some players just because of the large amount of dollars they afford to play them and fix some needs before the draft. It's going to be an interesting off-season.   
    • Sure, but despite being targeted less, he has more TDs than Odunze and more y/r than Nabers (and same number of TDs).  He's got a very similar y/r as Worthy.  He isn't stacking up that poorly to other WRs, but he has trailed off late - something that imo may indicate injury or needing to improve conditioning. He's not ever gonna be the best WR in this draft class, but he'll be in the top 3-5 with a bit of improvement imo.
    • Oh for sure. With Rod it’s never the defenses fault. I think someone posted this in Reddit a while back. Rod with the forwards. Rod with the defense.  
×
×
  • Create New...