Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young QB School

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Samppson Collaborator

Samppson

Posted
Posted

Good breakdown, probably the most positive of Bryce of all the breakdowns so far, but still pointed out the bad throws/mistakes. He seemed overall super happy and said it multiple times that this is what we were expecting to see more of coming out of Alabama. One game, but definitely a step forward

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, RJK said:

Did he point out the flutterer that was a dropped int that prob results in a loss? Hit the saints player right in the hands 

Yes, watch the breakdown. Or you can just throw out claims without watching like many are already are doing. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RJK Grand Master

RJK

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Yes, watch the breakdown. Or you can just throw out claims without watching like many are already are doing. 

As long as he pointed it out. Nobody else has 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, SOJA said:

The bottom line is bryce looks vastly better than weeks 1 and 2 and there is no reason to not play him moving forward. There is no downside. If he starts sucking again we are right back where we are right now. But if he can continue to improve (even if he will never be a top 10 QB) we can build the team around him and bide our time till the right QB becomes available. 

It used to be that way but now days what team is a regular true super bowl contender year in and out that doesn't have a top 10 qb?  You could say Minn i guess but that's just this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

is there a timestamp for that?  I dont have the time to listen to the entire thing

I didn't mark it. He seemed to go by drive if that helps. I honestly didn't realize it was so long as I was so interested in his take on the scheme Canales is running. He seemed to really like it.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I didn't mark it. He seemed to go by drive if that helps. I honestly didn't realize it was so long as I was so interested in his take on the scheme Canales is running. He seemed to really like it.

found it around the 17 minute mark,  why in the hell didnt bryce lead him?  And the play he does before was a jump ball to sanders who bailed his ass out.   He is still doing that hop poo and throwing off his back foot.  This has to be driving canales crazy

 

at 18 he eyeballs the wr and throws a duck that the corner simply doesnt catch.   I mean if folks want to say this was his best game then fine but holy fug then his body of work looks like a picasso of bad qb play

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

the moore play at 25 he is still bouncing on his toes and makes the throw.  I think I see what DC sees and its just not going to get better

He throws a wobble the next play to sanders

 

I noticed a lot of passes were big time wobblers, I wonder what’s going on for that to happen so much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, The Lobo said:

I noticed a lot of passes were big time wobblers, I wonder what’s going on for that to happen so much. 

I mean to be fair the underthrow at the end for the PI won the game so maybe he really is playing 3d chess.  But I know after watching that video Canales is done with his bullshit

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean to be fair the underthrow at the end for the PI won the game so maybe he really is playing 3d chess.  But I know after watching that video Canales is done with his bullshit

Whats crazy is the talking heads on espn, former players no less, loved his game. I don’t understand…

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthering Experienced

Panthering

Posted
Posted

That was a pleasant watch, certainly the best game of Bryce's career. JT praised some offensive design, shouted out the rookies making plays, and was just generally positive. There were a few bad throws he pointed out as well so it was more than fair. But seeing Bryce STAND TALL and deliver in the pocket was a massive plus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...