Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce is still the future


Gipetto
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Hes the future of a 5 guys franchise 

That's actually a good franchise to invest in. They are overpriced as hell these days yet still being the customers in. Damn good cheeseburger for sure but their prices have gotten higher than giraffe vagina currently 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He looked somewhat improved a little today but my God, the bar was so low for him after all the turds he has laid on the field that even looking minimally better makes him look hall of fame. I honestly don't think he could have looked much worse in his career leading up to this game so any ever so slight improvement will make him look better. Unfortunately he still does not look NFL starter worthy but now I'm curious to see what he looks like a couple more games just for fun so he should play against the shirt Giants and then play some in the gauntlet we have coming up of decent teams also. I don't suspect he ever looks like a star but maybe we will see minimal improvement which could make his trade value go up in the off-season 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

The funniest pass yesterday was that one 20 yard blimp he just heaved to no one in particular that someone came down with 

the announcers were like “he trusting his receivers!”

the wounded duck that got the PI was some lucky ass poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

the wounded duck that got the PI was some lucky ass poo

I give him a lil props for finally giving his receivers a chance in those situations but man... we all know you can't get away with that week to week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CPF4LIFE said:

I give him a lil props for finally giving his receivers a chance in those situations but man... we all know you can't get away with that week to week. 

Wilson has been for about a decade now. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I give him a lil props for finally giving his receivers a chance in those situations but man... we all know you can't get away with that week to week. 

Russell Wilson made a living off that stuff.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...