Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Starters (Where are they found in the draft)


SCO96
 Share

Recommended Posts

The data in the below table is somewhat dated. It covers the NFL offensive starters from 2017-2021 by where they were drafted. Interesting data. There are certain positions that usually need to be drafted as high in the first or 2nd round (QB, LT) in order to have a greater likelihood of success. Other positions have a good chance of finding starters even after rounds 1-2. The table below shows that 25% of the guards starting in round in the NFL during that period and 37% of the centers were found on day 3 (rounds 4-7).  If you include UDFA those numbers climb to 45% and 53% for those positions. Of course this data doesn't take into account how good these players perform on the field. It only considers the fact that they are starters for their team.

I'm going to try and find some information on defensive starters.

After seeing the success rates of players taken in round 7,  I now see I was justified in trading away those picks away to move up in the draft on the Madden Franchise Mode. 😆

According to the below table, UDFAs had a greater chance of starting for a team than players drafted in round 7. 🤔

https://www.windycitygridiron.com/2022/7/13/23206891/where-was-the-average-nfl-offensive-starter-drafted-by-position

  • OUR 2025 DRAFT PICKS (SO FAR)
  • First round pick
  • Second-round pick (via LA Rams)
  • Third round pick
  • Fourth round pick
  • Fifth round pick
  • Fifth Round pick (via Ravens)
  • Fifth-round pick (via NY Giants)
  • Seventh round pick
  • Seventh-round pick (via 49ers)

 

IMG_20241101_092357023.jpg

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I find interesting is that you are more likely to find successful players as UDFA's than you are to find them with a single pick in any round past 3.  Those 3rd round compensatory choices?  Largely worthless. 

Yes, I get it, there are a lot more UDFA's than there are drafted players in later rounds.  Basically, if you're fishing for starters you are simply not going to find anything in Rounds 4 - 7 with any regularity.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do wonder how it changes by team. Do teams that draft well draft that much better while teams that draft like us bring those % down to those averages?

QB in the 1st is a pretty obvious one for people who don't want to pick another 1st round QB next year. Like it or not that is the reality of the situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see this stat broken down by each team during the same time period.  I bet some of the good teams aren't much better at drafting then the middle of the road teams but they make up for it in free agency.   

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jtm said:

I'd love to see this stat broken down by each team during the same time period.  I bet some of the good teams aren't much better at drafting then the middle of the road teams but they make up for it in free agency.   

This ^ 100%.

Excited Lets Go GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seriously, this is the exact post that makes me lose my damn mind, because you can't separate Collegiate game from the NFL. You think college stats = NFL projections/ability The college game is littered with MONSTER stats from QB's who never make it past NFL training camps onto a roster.  I'm not saying Sanders is like that of course, but just because him and the offense put up huge numbers, doesn't mean he's a surefire elite NFL prospect. The fact that you can't or refuse to understand that, is why anything you say is severely flawed.  Bash me for my love of T-Mac, but you just can't separate college box score stats from NFL projections, which is just asinine.
    • Did anyone see, I believer it was from Cat crave blog, say Diana Russini is doubling down on her info that Bryce could be traded by the deadline? Maybe him starting is to try and up his trade value? 
    • Yes, NAU "shut him down" by literally triple teaming him on almost every snap, I don't care how good you are, when you're triple teamed and your QB is playing poorly and behind an OL that gives you all of 2 seconds to make a play, that WR isn't going to do anything that game unless your coaching staff schemes him up to get quick passes, which they didn't.   Our Arizona boards have been losing their poo all season over how bad the staff is using him and their play designs/calls.   And as I've said numerous times, QB's don't get mocked by draft grades, those same experts that had Young and Stroud at the top of those mock drafts also openly admitted they didn't have them graded that high, same as this year's class. Also as I've said numerous times, look at the position label or what they say about Hunter in those mock drafts, they almost all have him listed as CB and/or discuss him as a CB in their breakdown of him, because it's his better side of the ball and where he's more likely to play. 
×
×
  • Create New...