Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce is starter Sunday per Canales presser


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Even if Carr doesn't play, Rattler got benched for Jake Haener last week. 

Their OL is about as bad as it gets with guys being out. A couple of weeks ago I am pretty sure they were putting practice quad guys in to start. Like down to 3rd string in a couple of spots. That is gonna suck for Carr too. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

..said he wanted to give Andy another week with thumb

andy will be backupin 

wouldn't talk about Johnson. Not surprising 

and Young gets to have more experience with breaking the huddle and such lol

Are we really talking about Bust breaking the huddle when CJ won rookie of the year last year AND a bunch of rookies this year look great???

I am so done with him and never want to see him in the Panthers huddle again  

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 33inNC said:

Are we really talking about Bust breaking the huddle when CJ won rookie of the year last year AND a bunch of rookies this year look great???

I am so done with him and never want to see him in the Panthers huddle again  

 

That’s what Coach said in his presser

he also said he, himself, needed to get plays in quicker 

I suspect the truth of it was more in Monday when he spoke about ‘plays for Young to be successful’ paraphrased which translates to me as ‘it took a lot of time to find a play Bryce could do against that defense’

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where did I once say we should draft him because he's a projected Top 5 pick?   That's one of my many problems with you, your reading comprehension skills are very poor (and/or you just don't care to use your brain, one of the two).  I solely used that to point out that me pushing T-Mac isn't some absurd homerism, that at least I'm pushing someone who is deserving of a Top 5 draft pick. And despite me explaining it to you numerous times, you still seem to not grasp how QB's get placed in mock drafts vs draft grades.  They are treated entirely different in mock drafts to any other position, because of how teams generally treat them in the draft because of how important the position is. Literally any other position except QB, mock drafts generally follow draft grades with some team needs factored in.  But with QB's, draft grades are generally disregarded and they ALWAYS put a few QB's at the very top of the draft, because that's just usually what happens.  The exact same thing happened in 2022 with guys like Pickett and Willis widely being Top 10 picks in mock drafts, only for Pickett to fall to what, around 20?, and Willis going in the 2nd round (and even being the 3rd QB if I remember correctly too). The overwhelming majority of draft experts are saying there isn't a high first round grade on these QB's, but they still get mocked there because they're trying to predict how the draft will actually go. That's been my point the entire time, reaching for a QB in a bad QB draft when you have a roster as depleted of talent as ours, does not tend to work out well. And I've never said I'm not open to other players, I've very explicitly said that if a QB or DE stands out come draft time, I'm open to that discussion.  That I'd be open to Hunter as a CB but I prefer a WR over a CB at the top of the draft.  But we're also not talking about the 15th pick here where there could realistically be all sorts of possible picks to discuss.  With the first pick, there really would only be a small handful of options, T-Mac is head and shoulders above any other given our current roster and state of the franchise in general.
    • TMac is good, but he isn't pick 1 on a WR good.  Last year he would be below Nabers and Williams.  This year you could argue Hunter is the better WR.  WR at 1 better be a Calvin Johnson not a WR that disappears some games in college...
    • So because he's a projected top 5 pick he's should be the guy we draft.   Yet you say the other 2 QBs who are projected top 5 picks are not worth it because you think they aren't that good.   That's my problem with you. You just seem to only care about Tmac. I have yet to see you suggest anyone outside of Tmac. At least I'm open to other prospects.
×
×
  • Create New...