Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson benched

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Coheed Proficient

Coheed

Posted
Posted

As much as we suck, man that’s gotta be frustrating for Colts fans. The ability is so clearly there but he just doesn’t have the makeup for it.
 

Taking himself out of the game for what everyone knew would be a handoff says more to me than the stat line tbh, as I think it speaks to his unlikelihood (or likelihood, depending on how you look at it) of ever putting in the work necessary to meet his potential I don’t think he really understands the magnitude and responsibility of being QB1 for a franchise.  Also said he was a “great passer” and it’s just like…read the room man.

 

Def reading a lot into a small series of events but it does seem like what will be a deciding moment of his career

 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted

They had to sit him after his comments last week. And with that, I’m guessing he’s not going to be too happy about this benching. Wouldn’t surprise me if he tries to get outta there. 
 

Stroud was the only one worthy of the 1st round. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Coheed said:

As much as we suck, man that’s gotta be frustrating for Colts fans. The ability is so clearly there but he just doesn’t have the makeup for it.
 

Taking himself out of the game for what everyone knew would be a handoff says more to me than the stat line tbh, as I think it speaks to his unlikelihood (or likelihood, depending on how you look at it) of ever putting in the work necessary to meet his potential I don’t think he really understands the magnitude and responsibility of being QB1 for a franchise.  Also said he was a “great passer” and it’s just like…read the room man.

 

Def reading a lot into a small series of events but it does seem like what will be a deciding moment of his career

 

 

He might be trending Jamarcus Russell if he thinks he is a great passer. 

Yeah, he needs to be on the bench for a WHILE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, panther252 said:

They rushed it with Richardson. He was always a high upside raw talent that needed to sit and eased along. We would've been a good spot to develop him honestly since we had Dalton, but we would've needed some coaching stability. 

Without the Tepper factor, we would be a good spot for that. 

Yeah that 2023 draft, no one thought Levis or AR were up there with Stroud. It was clear who the possible guy was in that class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...