Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

If I thought like Tepper and felt the team is only a couple of players away from competing then that is probably what I would do. But this team is nowhere near being able to compete with anyone right now. They would be getting curb stomped even if they didn't have a single injury. This team will not break .500 for another 3 years. That's if Tepper doesn't fire everyone again and they magically hit on most of their draft picks. You cannot convince me otherwise. 

I don't disagree but that doesn't mean we can't sign free agents. I mean, we literally have to do this. Everyone in the NFL does.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't disagree but that doesn't mean we can't sign free agents. I mean, we literally have to do this. Everyone in the NFL does.

 

Again FA is not how you build a competitive team. That is for teams who already have talent. We don't have that right now.

 

At best you hit on 2 elite guys in FA. That's not turning this team around. We have to simply start drafting better. That's how you build your foundation. We have a decent Oline now and the WR room looks decent with the rookies. Now it's time to start adding some talent on defense. That's our biggest concern right now.

 

Hit on those draft picks and a few key FA guys and we can start talking about changing the culture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if I was a GM, my best players need to be drafted and retained before they hit the final year of the contract.  You supplement your roster in FA with primarily role players and to build depth on the roster.  Maybe if you're knocking on the superbowl window you make a splash signing but we all know that may not come for years if all things go right. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't disagree but that doesn't mean we can't sign free agents. I mean, we literally have to do this. Everyone in the NFL does.

 

Yup. Just not the expensive guys on day 1 unless you're a playoff team looking for that big missing piece. Looking for elite guys in free agency on a bottom team is a good way to stay at the bottom. Got to hit on those 6 to 10 million guys more as contributors around the draft picks to build up the team first. IMO that did terrible with that this year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless your whole front office (the football guys, Not Tepper)  are convinced a certain QB is the top prospect and a Franchise guy that can carry your team.   
Then trade down.  There are only 2 QBs really looked at as top 10-15 worthy QBs in this draft, and there are multiple other QB hungry teams like Jets, Giants, Browns, Raiders, Titans, etc fighting for 1.

 

We have about as many holes as an expansion team.  And 1-2 guys isn’t going to move the needle.  Luckily for us, this seems to be a strong Defensive class.  Add another top 50 pick in a trade down for another body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SurvivalSloth said:

I hate to break it to you, but at best - we're two years away from being competitive. Just take as much quality defensive talent and then worry about the long-term QB. If that means trading down to take DL, DE, or LBs - then we absolutely need to do it. 

Agree. We are not a QB away. I suspect we are picking top 5 in 2026 no matter what we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't disagree but that doesn't mean we can't sign free agents. I mean, we literally have to do this. Everyone in the NFL does.

 

Cheap 1 yr contracts sure. They have to field a complete roster of course. What I'm saying is they should not be handing out any contracts over 2 years to anyone until they draft their core players. So far i would argue they do not have na single one. Until that happens I do not have any faith that this team will ever be more than the worst team in the league. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Cheap 1 yr contracts sure. They have to field a complete roster of course. What I'm saying is they should not be handing out any contracts over 2 years to anyone until they draft their core players. So far i would argue they do not have na single one. Until that happens I do not have any faith that this team will ever be more than the worst team in the league. 

this is the way, give out cheap 1/2 year deals where needed but dont get stupid IE Miles Sanders

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Nobody is questioning Tmac the talent. There is no doubt he's the best WR prospect.

 

The problem is I have seen you say we should take him even at the #1 pick. That just doesn't make sense in my mind. You don't take a WR #1 overall. The last WR to be drafted #1 overall was Keyshawn Johnson in 1996. Under no circumstance do you take Tmac #1.

 

If you want Tmac just trade back a couple of spots so you can still get him while also getting extra picks. I have no problem with us drafting Tmac but it has to be the right spot.

 

 

Aren’t you the same person who has been advocating to take Hunter at #1 overall?

Someone who is more than likely going to be a CB in the NFL, a position that I don’t think has ever had someone go #1, because they never should be taken #1

I think over the next 10 years or so, there will be a bunch of WRs who go #1 overall with the way the game is shifting to being which a passing league.  Unless you have a Mahomes, which nobody else does, it’s near impossible to contend these days without a true elite WR

Really, QB, DE, and OT are the only positions to get drafted #1 overall over the last 20 years or so.  Just not sure there is someone at those positions worthy of us taking first overall if we have the pick, and if we can’t trade back and have to make the selection there, I think a true elite WR is exactly what we need to take, it’s been our biggest hole for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

Aren’t you the same person who has been advocating to take Hunter at #1 overall?

Someone who is more than likely going to be a CB in the NFL, a position that I don’t think has ever had someone go #1, because they never should be taken #1

I think over the next 10 years or so, there will be a bunch of WRs who go #1 overall with the way the game is shifting to being which a passing league.  Unless you have a Mahomes, which nobody else does, it’s near impossible to contend these days without a true elite WR

Really, QB, DE, and OT are the only positions to get drafted #1 overall over the last 20 years or so.  Just not sure there is someone at those positions worthy of us taking first overall if we have the pick, and if we can’t trade back and have to make the selection there, I think a true elite WR is exactly what we need to take, it’s been our biggest hole for a long time.

It's been a passing league for a decade now and still no WR has gone #1.

 

QB/DE are the main positions that are worthy of the highest pick. Every once and a while a LT will get lucky and go #1.

 

And no I never said take Hunter #1. I said anything outside of #1 is fair game just like I said for Tmac.

 

We would be fools to take either Tmac or Hunter #1 overall. Use that #1 pick as leverage trade back and still get either Hunter or Tmac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Aren’t you the same person who has been advocating to take Hunter at #1 overall?

Someone who is more than likely going to be a CB in the NFL, a position that I don’t think has ever had someone go #1, because they never should be taken #1

I think over the next 10 years or so, there will be a bunch of WRs who go #1 overall with the way the game is shifting to being which a passing league.  Unless you have a Mahomes, which nobody else does, it’s near impossible to contend these days without a true elite WR

Really, QB, DE, and OT are the only positions to get drafted #1 overall over the last 20 years or so.  Just not sure there is someone at those positions worthy of us taking first overall if we have the pick, and if we can’t trade back and have to make the selection there, I think a true elite WR is exactly what we need to take, it’s been our biggest hole for a long time.

was curious so I looked.  NFL history.  6 corners draft in the top 5 in NFL history.  Never one drafted in the top 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

It's been a passing league for a decade now and still no WR has gone #1.

 

QB/DE are the main positions that are worthy of the highest pick. Every once and a while a LT will get lucky and go #1.

 

And no I never said take Hunter #1. I said anything outside of #1 is fair game just like I said for Tmac.

 

We would be fools to take either Tmac or Hunter #1 overall. Use that #1 pick as leverage trade back and still get either Hunter or Tmac.

WRs have been taken #1 before.  And #2.  And #3. 

I think the decline in WRs being taken so high.....is the passing rules in today's NFL makes playing the position easier.  So there are a lot of WRs that are going to be successful today vs years ago.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

WRs have been taken #1 before.  And #2.  And #3. 

I think the decline in WRs being taken so high.....is the passing rules in today's NFL makes playing the position easier.  So there are a lot of WRs that are going to be successful today vs years ago. 

1996 was the last time a WR went #1.

 

I'm fine taking Tmac at #2. My only thing is don't take any position other than QB if we are staying at #1. If we want Tmac or Hunter just trade back a few spots. There are only 2 QBs who teams will be fighting over and that's Sanders and Ward. If they want a QB more than us then they will have to give us a good deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one is necessarily saying they want him to be third in receptions, but that it could happen and that it wouldn't be some automatic negative. At this point we have other younger, less experienced players who could of course end up producing more than Renfrow, but depending on game dynamics and coaching philosophy regarding experience and simple execution at/on the job, there is a scenario where Renfrow gets more play than most of the guys. That's all I'm saying.  Furthermore, run blocking is an understated part of the job and Renfrow isn't bad at that, but younger guys (especially rookies) need to master that before they become a regular staple in the flow of the game. In my opinion, some Huddlers are just discounting Renfrow a little too much while glorifying younger guys who still have a lot to learn. I've seen this story before. It's not about "infatuation" from the coaches' parts, and more about getting the receivers on the field who can do their job. And speaking of "infatuation," I'm not inclined to fall in love with the next best thing either. I've seen these players come and go on a consistent basis. I told people that Philly was JAG, and that's exactly how his short career played out. My advice would be to at least see players in a game before you crown them as roster material.
    • I agree with those that say Steve Smith won't make it.  No rings and probably pissed to many people off.  Neither will Cam.  His dominant period was to short.  Luke might, but its not a given.  
    • This defense needs someone other than Derrick Brown to bring some mean energy I like it. Of course, I'd rather him save it for the regular season or maybe joint practices but I'll take it. 
×
×
  • Create New...