Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Positive signs from Bryce


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, HardcoreHokie said:

I’m looking at Bryce’s career stats vs Jamarcus Russell’s and I mean….  

With Russell at least he had all world arm talent. You could understand what the Raiders saw in him and how they could be convinced that he could become an elite NFL QB. I just saw nothing in Bryce that made me think that he could become a high level NFL starter. I thought he projected as a marginal starter/good backup type and even with that evaluation I had him significantly overrated.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, strato said:

I don’t understand it. 
And it is fine to say, Mike Sanders sucks, Ian Thomas sucks, but don’t you fuging dare hate on Bryce. 

Miles actually looked decent today when he got touches. Bryce threw him a bad pass on that 4th down plan, but outside of that he looked good IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

I may be in minority but I saw some positive signs from Bryce today 

he stood in the pocket a lot more and threw despite the pressure,attempted throws downfield, showed better command and poise

Negatives; inconsistent accuracy, terrible timing of interceptions, needs to be more aggressive downfield.

i expected a worse performance tbh, he looked improved compared to first two weeks but not sure if he deserves more starts.

part of me wants to see if he can build off this, maybe I’m crazy

 

 

 

Godson you disappointed me with this post.

 

For that I can no longer call you Godson. You just Nas now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ghostofdelhomme said:

 

There is no Qb worthy of a top 3 pick next year so whoever gives the team the best chance to win is going to play for the next 1-2 years. Bryce is durable at least and did more than Mayfield and Rodgers and Herbert against this defense

Being durable is only a positive if you're good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

He genuinely looks like if you grabbed a 22 year old fan out of the stands and handed him the football.

He's small, he's slow, he doesn't know the plays, he can't read the field, he can't make the throws, he doesn't want to get hit - it's actually astounding to watch.

So he’s short, small, weak, super slow, has a weak arm, and not good at football.

But he’s smart on paper kinda!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Miles actually looked decent today when he got touches. Bryce threw him a bad pass on that 4th down plan, but outside of that he looked good IMO. 

You probably haven’t noticed that I have commented a couple of times that he was running hard this year. From the 1st game. 
I used him because people say He Sucks a lot. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can't recall another #1 pick or high 1st rounder period that just looked like he flat out didn't have NFL caliber talent. Plenty bust, but it's usually not because of a complete and utter lack of NFL caliber physical talent. There's other factors that made the physical talent not translate. But with Bryce he just flat out looks like he doesn't belong. If you didn't know who he was you'd assume he was a UDFA who went to the owner's D3 alma mater or something and only got his NFL cup of coffee because of that and he has no shot of actually making a roster.

Sounds like Bersin. Calling him the Bersin of QBs is about right.

Edited by BIGH2001
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm honestly not sure he's even long-term backup caliber.

What is there to be unsure of?  Maybe some HGH in the offseason to grow a little?  Finally learn some fundamentals?  Find a single solitary competitive spark?

Little bro is on the fast track to SEC TV.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Godson you disappointed me with this post.

 

For that I can no longer call you Godson. You just Nas now.

I seriously doubt anyone would ever care if you are disappointed.  You should mature a little and let other people have different opinions than yours

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...