2025 Mock Drafts

[45catfan]

Trade back is the only option, if we can find a trading partner.  I love the Raiders.  They are as desperate for a QB as we were in 2023. We can be the Bears in this scenario and they can be the suckers--Panthers.  I played around in a mock (not posting it) but we can rebuild this defense and get a couple more weapons for the offense with a trade down at the top of the board.

[ncfan]

My favorite in yet

traded down to get an additional 2 this year.  And a 1st next year

 

Edge Rusher

Stud athletic safety

 Big monster TE to run 2 TE sets with him and Sanders

a solid CB2 candidate 

A Chubba replacement at RB

a deep threat WR

[SOJA]

On 11/1/2024 at 11:43 PM, R0CKnR0LLA said:

My patented "ignore the QBs, trade down over and over and over" draft strategy.

 

you could stop your draft after pick 43 and that would be a HOF draft 

[ForJimmy]

https://www.bleachernation.com/bears/2024/11/04/2025-nfl-mock-draft-1104/

This one is for @tukafan21

[tukafan21]

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

https://www.bleachernation.com/bears/2024/11/04/2025-nfl-mock-draft-1104/

This one is for @tukafan21

[CPF4LIFE]

New mock I just did post trade deadline. I really like this one.

[Panthero]

On 11/3/2024 at 8:21 AM, 45catfan said:

Trade back is the only option, if we can find a trading partner.  I love the Raiders.  They are as desperate for a QB as we were in 2023. We can be the Bears in this scenario and they can be the suckers--Panthers.  I played around in a mock (not posting it) but we can rebuild this defense and get a couple more weapons for the offense with a trade down at the top of the board.

Don't we still need a qb, though?

[45catfan]

3 hours ago, Panthero said:

Don't we still need a qb, though?

Yes, in 2026. Either Bryce or FA next year.

[CamWhoaaCam]

On 11/4/2024 at 3:44 PM, tukafan21 said:

Good luck with that we are slowly falling out of range for Tmac and Hunter.

 

This draft went from being exciting to damn we really about to screw ourselves out of 2 game changing prospects. All for some meaningless wins at the end of the season smh.

[tukafan21]

7 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Good luck with that we are slowly falling out of range for Tmac and Hunter.

 

This draft went from being exciting to damn we really about to screw ourselves out of 2 game changing prospects. All for some meaningless wins at the end of the season smh.

Look at our schedule, Cowboys are probably our only winnable game left unless we can beat the Bucs, but Evans will be back by then too.

If we only win 1 more game (or none) we’ll still probably end up picking around 4-6 in the end, if a couple QB’s go in the first few picks, will come down to team needs, but I’m hoping we can still get my guy T-Mac

Edited Monday at 08:08 AM by tukafan21

[*FreeFua*]

Now that we’re probably picking in that 5-10 range give me Luther Burder

We desperately need some damn speed at WR

[CamWhoaaCam]

8 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Look at our schedule, Cowboys are probably our only winnable game left unless we can beat the Bucs, but Evans will be back by then too.

If we only win 1 more game (or none) we’ll still probably end up picking around 4-6 in the end, if a couple QB’s go in the first few picks, will come down to team needs, but I’m hoping we can still get my guy T-Mac

Now look at the teams ahead of us in the draft.

 

Jacksonville/New England/Cleveland/New Orleans would almost certainly be in the market for a WR.

 

No chance Tmac is on the board as it stands today. Maybe if we get back in the top 5. You said yourself Tmac is the best prospect in the draft. So how would he be available at #10?

[tukafan21]

57 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Now look at the teams ahead of us in the draft.

 

Jacksonville/New England/Cleveland/New Orleans would almost certainly be in the market for a WR.

 

No chance Tmac is on the board as it stands today. Maybe if we get back in the top 5. You said yourself Tmac is the best prospect in the draft. So how would he be available at #10?

Example #1,294 of you not actually reading my posts before you respond to them.

Me:  "I think we're going to win 1 more game at most, end up in the 4-6 pick range, and hope a couple QB's go and then will come down to team needs if T-Mac falls to us"

You:  "Maybe if we get back in the top 10, you say he's the best prospect in the draft, so how would he be available at #10"

MY DUDE.... I literally just said I think we're getting back in the Top 5 range and then said how I'd hope we still land him, so what's the point of saying "how it stands today" as I obviously know that.

In regards to the specific teams you called out... 

New Orleans has Olave and Shaheed who was looking really good before getting hurt, and they will want to move on from Carr.  Given their cap issues moving forward, they aren't investing a high first round pick in WR given those two they already have, I think they'd be a QB draft pick team, and that's if they're before us, they have a bunch of winnable games left.

Cleveland could use a WR after trading Cooper of course, but I think they want to move on from the Watson saga so badly that if they can draft one of the QB's, they would as well.

Jacksonville could concern me a little because they could want to give Lawrence another elite weapon, but they also have OL issues I believe and could see them going that route to protect him instead.  They also end with 5 straight very winnable games, so not sure they're going to be picking ahead of us anyways.

New England is the team in your list that would scare me the most, as they badly need a true #1 WR for Maye, and they have a rough schedule ahed of them.  I'd just have to hope they go the Hunter route, which given their HC being a former defensive player, I could very well see them go that way.  Would be fitting though if he ends up there, two best players in school history end up as Patriots legends with him and Gronk (not to mention Teddy Bruschi was a Wildcat as well lol).

After those teams....

Tennessee scares me a lot too as I think if they want to give Levis another season, T-Mac would be a great weapon for them to pair with Ridley and see what he can do with his big arm.  Same goes for the Raiders if they were to not get a QB themselves, as they have a clear need there now that they traded Adams.

Zero concern about the Jets or Dolphins taking a WR with the ones they have and their other issues, same goes for the Giants as they'd take a QB and I don't see them taking two WR's in the top 10 back to back years if they were to not take a QB.

So yea, if we stay at 10, we're not getting him, but if we are in that 4-6 range, very decent chance there could be 2 QB's, maybe an OL or Hunter, maybe a pass rusher if it's a team like the Jets who have WRs.  That puts him still sitting there at #6, but even that will take some luck and I think any further down and we won't be able to get him.

Edited Monday at 05:48 PM by tukafan21