Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers move up to #2 overall


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

The goal should be #1 so we can trade back with Vegas for more picks so we can fill the holes on this team.

 

I know everyone wants a QB, but I do not trust Tepper taking another QB #1. If he misses again that might be my final straw leaving this team for good.

 

Do the right thing trade back and build your roster. The Bears showed us how it's done. They only had to wait the following year to get their QB. There is hope.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The goal should be #1 so we can trade back with Vegas for more picks so we can fill the holes on this team.

 

I know everyone wants a QB, but I do not trust Tepper taking another QB #1. If he misses again that might be my final straw leaving this team for good.

 

Do the right thing trade back and build your roster. The Bears showed us how it's done. They only had to wait the following year to get their QB. There is hope.

Who will be dumb enough to give up what we gave to get Bryce, then luck out and get the #1 pick from them.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Golfdaddya-go-go said:

Could solve future at QB by trading for Justin Fields NOW...Steelers get choice of 2.... Bryce or M Sanders or Johnson or Mingo

Trading for Fields would absolutely not solve our QB issues for the future, it would just be a continuation of the awful trend that got us here - trading assets  for what ultimately amounts to a bandaid over an amputation wound. 

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

I know everyone wants a QB, but I do not trust Tepper taking another QB #1. If he misses again that might be my final straw leaving this team for good.

 

This.... You know this megalomaniac can't wait to be in this position again....only to fk it up royally, again .....

Edited by Johnstonny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Patriots are awful…almost as bad as the Panthers. But their future is bright, Maye has shown flashes. He just needs some pieces and they’re going to get the draft picks to do just that. 

Meanwhile the Panthers has an owner that has zero clue and will continue to have poo drafts and good personnel who don’t want to come here.

This organization is so inept I honestly don’t think high picks will even matter. Just like the Browns for the past two decades.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...