Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold Vikings


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

 I think 80% of his passes go to Justin Jefferson, a RB or TE.   That’s probably the ideal Sam Darnold formula.  Think the Justin Jefferson piece is the key to the Sam puzzle.  If you don’t have JJ…I don’t think Sam works 

Sam has never been good at going through his progressions. He has one or two players he is gonna throw to and, dagnabit, he is gonna throw that ball to them even if a defender is covering them.  
JJ is just really really good at making it easy for Sam. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Haven't changed my avatar for 3 years. He was never the problem here, as the last 3 starting QBs and 4 head coaches have shown. 

I was 100% in favor of sticking with Sam and trying to build around him, but I knew this short-sighted fanbase would want to bail after 1 bad year. So I proposed starting Dam Sarnold who was just Darnold with Groucho Marx glasses. 

But no. We'll just keep spinning the roulette wheel every year on QBs and coaches. Eventually that strategy is sure to work. After all, the definition of sanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results, right?

You think the fanbase is calling the shots on all these qb and coaching changes?  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes a franchise is just cursed. They’ve looked inept with every coach/gm/roster tepper has put on the field.  You’d think eventually they’d stumble on a good player or coach but nah. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Is he fixed or is he just on a team that can make it easy for him and cover up his problem areas. 
 

I'd say that technically equals "fixing".

Bottom Line: He looks pretty good, and it's lasted more than four games 😐

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd say that technically equals "fixing".

Bottom Line: He looks pretty good, and it's lasted more than four games 😐

Sounds more patched up than fixed. He is on a 1 year deal for 10 mil. Go ahead and sign him to a 30+ deal and cut some talent to make room for that contract and see it less patched up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd say that technically equals "fixing".

Bottom Line: He looks pretty good, and it's lasted more than four games 😐

Darnold is Darnold. He hasn’t looked that good the last 2 weeks. In the playoffs he will meet defenses that will make him play outside his comfort zone if they make it. 
As I said before, the Vikings have the perfect team around Darnold. If he was on any other team he would be the same ole Darnold. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RJK said:

Sometimes a franchise is just cursed. They’ve looked inept with every coach/gm/roster tepper has put on the field.  You’d think eventually they’d stumble on a good player or coach but nah. 

The operative word is, Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icky is having a great year and played better at LT than Christensen. Mayes at C over Christensen is the headscratcher to me.
    • I think cats are probably going to be the most dangerous predator because that's how they survive.  That's why they evolved the way they did. Bears though are HUGE with sharp claws, thick fur and skin, and can develop terrible cocaine additions (sorry, but that movie is so much fun, well half of it).   In a 1v1, with animals who are set up and provoked into combat, it's going to be challenging.  The cats will fight until they realize they can't win and try to escape.  While they can be fierce, they also have a high survival instinct.  You don't see them downing healthy bull elephants.  Bear are very fierce, but they are energy conscious.  If there's plenty of food around, like when the weather is warm, they will be relentless.  When it's leaner, they will be smart. So...I guess it depends?  Right now, I'd put money on the bears over the cats.  Cats are devastating, but also smart.   Also, what kind of bears are we talking about?  Polar Bears?  Grizzly?  Black?  Panda?  kind of a range lol.
    • Anyone else not happy with this decision? I like what we have going with Christensen. Not sure I would disrupt that. JMO
×
×
  • Create New...