Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers will not trade Chuba Hubbard


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I take it you do?

I’d say you can look at successful teams and then look at the Panthers and spot some very basic differences…

so yeah, I think one thing you don’t do in todays NFL is pay big 2nd contracts to RBs (Sanders), spend a 2nd round pick on a RB, and then pay a big 2nd contract to a vet  again (with Hubbard). 

but maybe you can find me a good team doing that in todays NFL.  Playing the Panthers are smarter and shouldn’t be challenged is a bold strategy given we are the biggest clown show in all of pro sports 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Am I the only one here that thinks we should see if Brooks can even play in the NFL before we ship Chuba off lol?

I agree, that's really the main reason why I'm interesting in him to play. 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

If you’re leaking he won’t be traded you have to resign him. 

like now. 

lock up the RB for whomever the next young qb is. 

Either that or trying to drive up the price.  I hope it's the later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TN05 said:

I am sick of seeing our top talent shipped off to other teams for peanuts. Re-sign him.

Not similar to other examples imo. He's a good RB. Not an elite RB, or play a premier position. With Brooks, I would use assets elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

If you’re leaking he won’t be traded you have to resign him. 

like now. 

lock up the RB for whomever the next young qb is. 

Well one way or another it helps give him more leverage. We did the same thing with Burns. It only got worse from here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Not similar to other examples imo. He's a good RB. Not an elite RB, or play a premier position. With Brooks, I would use assets elsewhere. 

That's what people said about McCaffrey, and Moore, too. It's always wrong.

He's averaging 5.6 yards per carry and nearly 100 yards a game. He's driven, and wants to excel. Pay the man. I'm sick of being a farm team.

Edited by TN05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TN05 said:

That's what people said about McCaffrey, and Moore, too. It's always wrong.

He's averaging 5.6 yards per carry and nearly 100 yards a game. He's driven, and wants to excel. Pay the man. I'm sick of being a farm team.

Everyone called CMC elite.

And Moore was shipped in order to get a perceived franchise QB. Way diff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...