Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Fowler: Panthers aren’t eager to trade Diontae Johnson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/16/2024 at 4:45 PM, pantherj said:

Anyone on this team is on the trading block for the right price imo. The hard reality is that even with a good o-line, veteran QB, and decent weapons we're still the worst team in the NFL. That's when you know it's over for the next couple of seasons, so ANY advantageous trade should be taken imo. Now Morgan and Canales are fighting for their jobs, so they'll want to hang on to productive players and may pass on a sweet deal. Like Fitt passed on two first round picks for Burns because he had a win now gotta' save my job mentality. Drop a Steph Curry QB into place and we're winning. It was a fantasy. We need reality. I want a GM like Gettleman but with actual draft evaluation abilities. 

Browns are worse. Patriots are definitely worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Shocker said:

I think if they are offered a 3rd he will get moved

DeVante Adams just went for a conditional 3rd. 

Amari Cooper just went for a 3rd. 

I think the Panthers should no brainer it if offered a 4th.  Dalton is playing QB.  The emphasis should be on all the WRs that possibly have a future here.  Johnson isn't in AT territory.  If he can prove to be a good guy this season, he belongs on a NFL field as #2.  And the only way for us to have a shot at him would be to pay a #2, #1 money.  And we should be smarter than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CRA said:

DeVante Adams just went for a conditional 3rd. 

Amari Cooper just went for a 3rd. 

I think the Panthers should no brainer it if offered a 4th.  Dalton is playing QB.  The emphasis should be on all the WRs that possibly have a future here.  Johnson isn't in AT territory.  If he can prove to be a good guy this season, he belongs on a NFL field as #2.  And the only way for us to have a shot at him would be to pay a #2, #1 money.  And we should be smarter than that. 

Interesting point.  I still would like the 3rd.  B^)

If he isn’t traded that might signal they are willing to pay him but it needs to be realistic.  I think if we get a number 1 guy this WR corps looks fantastic 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...