Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Basketball 2024


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Jack up threes, drive and flail and try to get to the FT line. That's basically the whole sport now.

I don't look at college stats that much but was looking at betting Proctors assists against Louisville.  I started looking into it and most teams are only getting like 10-12 assists a fuging game. That said i did not bet on it. 

 

Houston and Tennessee scored 70+ pts in their championship games and only had 7 assists each

Edited by toldozer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, toldozer said:

I don't look at college stats that much but was looking at betting Proctors assists against Louisville.  I started looking into it and most teams are only getting like 10-12 assists a fuging game. That said i did not bet on it. 

 

Houston and Tennessee scored 70+ pts in their championship games and only had 7 assists each

Not surprised. Everyone is running the same ISO dribble ball bullshit. It's the way the elite recruits want to play because that's NBA ball. IMO the ticket to consistent success in this environment is to forget about the elite recruits. Let someone else buy them. Focus on good recruits who buy into a system, probably don't have legit NBA hopes, and want to maximize their NIL earnings knowing that a future in the NBA is probably not in the cards. Gobble up as many of those guys as you can and play team ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

UNC just needs to accept their NIT standing and be done with it. Honestly, I'm not sure UNC could win the NIT either.

Surely to God we wouldn't accept a fuging NIT bid. Hell, even Wake Forest finally developed a little pride and declined an NIT bid. LOL!

We might not win the NIT but we kept Wake out of the dance.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Surely to God we wouldn't accept a fuging NIT bid. Hell, even Wake Forest finally developed a little pride and declined an NIT bid. LOL!

We might not win the NIT but we kept Wake out of the dance.

lol

UNC did turn down an NIT invite a couple of years ago. That's why I brought it up, well, that and your post about the play in game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh good lord, UNC AD Bubba Cunningham was the chair of the selection committee and we get in as what they admit was the last team in when most assumed we were out after he gives our coach who should probably be fired a 5 year extension? Jesus, this is such a bad look.

I didn't want us to get a bid already and now the optica of this? Fug...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Reporters have kept hinting our love for those two and it's continuing this week.  It's honestly a concern for me. Why? Well, I think it's safe to say (4) guys in Ward, Carter, Hunter, & at least 1 OL are gone by our pick. That leaves (3) more picks before ours with a group of (6) guys in Graham DT, OL2, Jeanty RB, McMillan WR, Johnson CB, & Warren TE.  This is not even counting if someone reaches for Shedeur or what seems like the fan fave choice in Walker.  That's near the end of what I'd define as sure-thing, higher end R1 talent.    So, the short of it is that a clear Round 1 talent will be available at 8.       Thing is, I can't help but sense an XL situation is happening again and we are completely locked in on grabbing a specific guy/role, no matter who falls.  They even locked in the interior via FA to pigeon this situation.  BPA is going out the window a bit.  Can anyone shake this growing sentiment, or are we looking at the same situation as last year?    I don't know, but even if Graham or McMillan fall, I'm really getting the sense we're just locked in on these two developmental EDGE guys with poor pass rushing skills and we'll have to stomach taking them over potential trade-downs and some straight up more impactful talent.   Talk me out of this concern. Thanks  
    • Tee left so much money on the table, it’s crazy. Chase and Burrow didn’t leave any crumbs, so why did he?
    • so to be clear, upon your review, an All Pro/Pro Bowl/All Rookie Team season isn't an example of a rookie showing his team he is a legit NFL player?  That's some mental gymnastics IMO.  you concede Morgan.  So that's 2 out of your 3.   Which does leave Jenkins, who still managed 11 starts as a rookie and was a Pro Bowler by year 2.  I just don't see how THAT trio is what you are going to dig your heels in on as the example of needing time and patience.   Sure everyone needs time to develop.  Some positions more than others (as I highlighted, I think guys in trenches need more time than other spots).  But in today's NFL, skill players should be showing you windows and glimpses they were the right pick pending they get opportunity and their aren't unusual circumstances.   It's not 1990.  They are out there running college schemes in today's NFL.  Passing game is totally different today.  And it's way you see all these 1k seasons from rookie after rookie after rookie after rookie today...they didn't exist years ago.  So when Mingo looks like utter trash......you don't need to let 3 years in the books sink in before starting to judge him.   
×
×
  • Create New...