Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade for Justin Fields?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I think his ability to run gives you a new element and extends drives. Dalton is one of the best in the league right now at downfield throws so the passing would regress a little but I'm not saying fields can't make throws. Dj moore had one of his best seasons with fields so I think he could also get the ball to  Johnson. 

Overall I would rather watch fields than Bryce. 

I guess the real question is to what end does this trade really make any sense?

Just sign him as a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Might be easier to get him in a trade than as a free agent.  If the front office wants him.  

I rather doubt it, TBH. I suspect he isn't going to be a high priced FA. He wasn't sought after as a trade when Pittsburgh got him.

I would expect him to be somewhere in the range of price that Dalton was. $5-7 mil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I guess the real question is to what end does this trade really make any sense?

Just sign him as a FA.

Bingo!

 

No need to trade assets for a guy who will be available in FA.

 

Hell I'm not a fan of this QB class. If we get the #1 pick why not trade it to the highest bidder. We need to load up on defense anyway.

 

Sign Fields for a cheap 3yr deal and go from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bingo!

 

No need to trade assets for a guy who will be available in FA.

 

Hell I'm not a fan of this QB class. If we get the #1 pick why not trade it to the highest bidder. We need to load up on defense anyway.

 

Sign Fields for a cheap 3yr deal and go from there.

Eh....I mean....I am kind of scarred by recent trading down. I like the idea in theory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, strato said:

If we could trade down not too far and pick up enough to get back in at the end of the first, it is something that would interest me. Depending on what things look like by that time as far as how what they might be able to do with the picks. 

Trade back with Vegas who will no doubt be all in on Sanders especially with the Brady connection who is now part owner. Sanders was also taking pics at the Vegas game with the Raiders owner.

 

Take them for everything they got.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...