Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting take on Evero and why no change in scheme

raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NCBlu said:

After not giving EE the HC job they should have let him walk.

He had other DC offers he was looking to take ..

That's on Tepper who didn't learn after the OL coach debacle from last season.. 

It seems to me it was based on getting the compensation for promoting minorities. That rule. You lose a guy to a HC job, with him at your place for two years, you get a pick. 

And they expected that to happen so they wanted him to pull his two years before letting him go. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

he’s horrible

Whether they are blue chip or just a guy, young or old, they are pro players 

to my mind, there is zero excuse for not taking proper angles on tackles or allowing a running back to be at the second level almost immediately after the handoff implying zero gap control…they can’t even slow the runner down

i think the point the commentator was making is, you have what you have, fat or not, make an adjustment to that vs stubbornly doing what you have been doing that is not working…. at all.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, strato said:

Symbiotic relationship. I am about to give them something to chew on, for some clicks. A nice divisive take for them to pound.

Edit: I retract that... I made a mistake watching Trevin Wallace locker room interviews. He was all smiling and not pissed off, and I was like wtf why are you all happy right after getting your ass kicked?

So I went back to gather a couple of these videos and they are not immediately after the game, but the next day or even a Wednesday locker room thing. 

That's good to see that - I was trying to misjudge him, it fuging bothered me seeing a player smile after a loss. But that isn't what it was. So good. But I won't be making that thread.

Patience my friend. The cream will rise to the top by seasons end. 

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Patience my friend. The cream will rise to the top by seasons end. 

I expect it. I am happy to see the mistake I made (though now I do want to find postgame video). I was good with the pick and agree he'll get better. This will be good for him in the long run. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Donald LaFell Veteran

Donald LaFell

Posted
Posted

The talent level just isn’t high enough to evaluate the coach so it’s a chicken/egg situation on who to blame.
 

It’s nbd to me if Evero stays or leaves but if he leaves you’ll have a pretty weak D with a new coordinator, maybe a new scheme, new players, and maybe some guys that won’t fit. The results will definitely be the same for a year or two. We’ve been so terrible I’m just thirsty for anything consistent. 
 

As long as Caneles is improving he can pick his own DC. I can see Evero leaving for that reason alone. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

The talent level just isn’t high enough to evaluate the coach so it’s a chicken/egg situation on who to blame.
 

It’s nbd to me if Evero stays or leaves but if he leaves you’ll have a pretty weak D with a new coordinator, maybe a new scheme, new players, and maybe some guys that won’t fit. The results will definitely be the same for a year or two. We’ve been so terrible I’m just thirsty for anything consistent. 
 

As long as Caneles is improving he can pick his own DC. I can see Evero leaving for that reason alone. 

The constant staff turnover is a factor for sure. I think, realistically, we should continue with the scheme so we can at least not take big steps backwards.

I know the argument could be that we have nothing and it is the right tie to change it because we have nothing to lose, but I would be hesitant.

We have some young players with some potential playing in this scheme right now and the depth guys are getting a lot of experience as well. 

You go changing it again and wtf, more years of pain. Just stick another 3/4 DC type in there and keep rolling (over, lol).

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, raleigh-panther said:

Yep

I noticed a set with the OLB lined up on the line with a fairly big gap next to the DT, every time that set was shown, RB ran into that purposefully left gap for 5 to 10 yards a pop….over and over again  I’ve never been a fan of 3 4 4 or 5 2 4 in any case

kinda like Canales always calling a pass after a first down run gains 4 to 6 yards 

they need to self scout …and quickly …both of them

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, hepcat said:

So playing the corners 15 yards off the receivers on 3rd and 4 is because the players don’t fit his scheme

Do you know which play that was? Because I just spent a good bit of time watching and may have missed that but I didn't see it. They were 6-8 yards deep most of what I saw, outside the red zone and longer 'to go' downs.

That's pretty egregious. I did get tired of watching in the 4th quarter and skimmed through a couple of series so maybe it was there? 

I did see confusion among the DBs on some plays.

And sorry to Wallace but he didn't have much of a game.  I don't even know or care what his tackle numbers were, it was how he looked getting them.  Maybe I misunderstand his responsibilities and fits but he wasn't really running to the ball they way I am used to seeing. Just looked a little slow and not as physical as I wanted to see. Maybe he is thinking to much.... 

So on him I will echo earlier comments: he needs to work and get stronger this offseason. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, strato said:

Do you know which play that was? Because I just spent a good bit of time watching and may have missed that but I didn't see it. They were 6-8 yards deep most of what I saw, outside the red zone and longer 'to go' downs.

That's pretty egregious. I did get tired of watching in the 4th quarter and skimmed through a couple of series so maybe it was there? 

I did see confusion among the DBs on some plays.

And sorry to Wallace but he didn't have much of a game.  I don't even know or care what his tackle numbers were, it was how he looked getting them.  Maybe I misunderstand his responsibilities and fits but he wasn't really running to the ball they way I am used to seeing. Just looked a little slow and not as physical as I wanted to see. Maybe he is thinking to much.... 

So on him I will echo earlier comments: he needs to work and get stronger this offseason. 

It was the bengals game I saw it most egregiously, can’t remember when in the game though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...