Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I have accepted that Bryce is a bust


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

We'll have finished paying for him next draft, that'll be fun. 

Giving up pick 33 or something for a guy we can't get a 6th for. When that's done, all the spilt milk will be out of the glass and on the floor. 

They need to move him ASAP when that calendar turns to the new league year, and just keep walkin'. Take the hit whatever it is; his mere presence is a threat to progress.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't tell anyone. There's still people who think he's great so they just might be able to trade him for something, anything really. 

I have a friend who argues till he's blue in the face that Bryce just needs a new shot with a coach that configure an offense around his skillset. I am like "What skillset! He does nothing well!". He's not the biggest, doesn't have the best pocket presence, he isn't the fastest, but he does have a weak arm!

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

SF moved on quickly from Lance. We should do the same 

easier for them, given they stumbled upon a rookie who went undefeated until the NFCCG

we got an empty cupboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

I have a friend who argues till he's blue in the face that Bryce just needs a new shot with a coach that configure an offense around his skillset. I am like "What skillset! He does nothing well!". He's not the biggest, doesn't have the best pocket presence, he isn't the fastest, but he does have a weak arm!

I think he could post a winning record in a 100% healthy SF O.  That's about it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember during his first preseason I was questioning his arm strength and I got poo-ed on by several forum members who said I was just grasping at straws and I didn't know what I was talking about. 

Edited by ACobra289
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

I have a friend who argues till he's blue in the face that Bryce just needs a new shot with a coach that configure an offense around his skillset. I am like "What skillset! He does nothing well!". He's not the biggest, doesn't have the best pocket presence, he isn't the fastest, but he does have a weak arm!

Show him the 2024 passing charts. 

And ask him how that is supposed to work.

Edited by strato
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I accepted it mainly this offseason going back and watching tape. It really hit home that first half in New Orleans. He just is shellshocked beyond repair and there wasn't much to work with from the jump anyway

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...