Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First Goal Game 2024!!!


Recommended Posts

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Amazing how some player's fug up their careers making millions of dollars for no reason.  Bone head apparently can't fit in anywhere.
    • Honestly we really needed a shifty back to help with YAC. Chuba is good as an RB but he just isn't really good out of the back field. I agree with most of what you've said re: receivers, but I do think it's scheme heavily. As to YAC numbers, I was looking at it per reception (so yeah, average 🙂 )... Because Coker hasn't had enough receptions yet I had to turn off filtering which meant it ranked him across everyone catching a ball all year. Those stats are *dominated* by RBs, and Coker is around 100 overall across all RBs, TEs, and WRs at 7 YAC/r... Which is pretty good for a wideout, because it includes rarely used players, etc. Sanders is ~6 YAC/r which is again pretty good for a TE.  If all our receivers had their YAC production, we'd have a ton more passing yards. I think Canales schemes players open, but not so much so wide open they can make a lot of YAC related plays.
    • If that's the lineman they had a couple years ago, he's put on weight
×
×
  • Create New...