Travis Hunter hype thread

[Champagnepapi704]

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You are confusing bro.

 

I get your love affair for Tmac, but it's strange you say you think Hunter is elite, yet you question people when they bring his name up.

 

Something not adding up. You writing paragraphs on a guy you supposedly saying is elite. But giving reasons as to why he's not good for us.

 

Chill out bro nobody is going to forget about Tmac in the draft lol.

Just because someone gives valid points why he won't be elite you're confused?

[CamWhoaaCam]

17 minutes ago, Champagnepapi704 said:

Just because someone gives valid points why he won't be elite you're confused?

He's quoting me for something I never said. He's been repeating this same thing for weeks now.

 

I'm confused because he keeps bringing me up as if I said Hunter is playing both side which was his point as to why we shouldn't draft him.

 

Makes sense now?

[flagfootballcoach28]

Drafting a CB at #1? I’ll pass 

[tukafan21]

13 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He's quoting me for something I never said. He's been repeating this same thing for weeks now.

 

I'm confused because he keeps bringing me up as if I said Hunter is playing both side which was his point as to why we shouldn't draft him.

 

Makes sense now?

Show me one time that I specifically said YOU have said he'll play both sides of the ball in the NFL.

I keep saying that "people" as in the general term, keep talking about taking him in the draft and then gushing about his two way ability in college, which by the way is 100% something you have done on many occasions by the way.

And I just keep reiterating that people (again, the general term, not talking about any one person in particular) need to stop talking about his 2 way ability when talking about him as a draft prospect, it's completely irrelevant.  If you want to gush about his college play and/or Heisman chances, then sure, go ahead, that is 100% warranted and I've said as much many times, as he is a generational collegiate talent, no question about that.

You have also said on numerous occasions that you'd take him over T-Mac for either side of the ball, which again, I keep giving extremely valid reasons why that would be a terrible decision if he's going to be a WR.

In fact, the only time I specifically mentioned you in this discussion was in regards to my post NOT being about bashing Hunter the college player or general draft prospect, since you are the person who has numerous times "called me out" for bashing him and saying you don't understand why I would do that.  

The only confusion is that you seem to confuse the difference between bashing a player and giving pros/cons as to their NFL prospects at a specific position.  

Saying someone is a likely Top 10 pick on one side of the ball and still a 1st rounder on the other side, but the 2nd or 3rd best prospect at one of those positions is anything but bashing, it's giving supreme credit to the player, but acknowledging some issues for him at the next level on one of those sides of the ball.

[tukafan21]

8 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Drafting a CB at #1? I’ll pass 

This too

If you take a CB in the Top 5, they HAVE to be a home run pick and be a decade long lock down corner.  

That's why I've said I'd take T-Mac #1 over Hunter on either side of the ball, without a second thought.

If someone wants to argue a pass rusher I don't know as much about, like the kid from I think Tennessee, then okay, I can't really argue that because we need a pass rusher and I know nothing about him.  But I know how long we've tried to find a true #1 WR and how rare it is to find someone with the size and talent of T-Mac and I think passing on him at any draft slot would be a mistake.

[Aussie Tank]

We need other teams to fall in love with a prospect we’re gonna need a kings ransom for our pick 

[PappyMay]

5 hours ago, Shocker said:

Why would Prime have any say on where he goes?

He came out and said both him and his son will go top 4 and that there could be an Eli Manning situation ahead.