Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dalton Honeymoon Over


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

True that not everything was Young's fault.

Also true that Young isn't very good.

So, there is a tendency to be a bit of an echo chamber here. The easy national narrative that we did Bust Young wrong is going to come right back into focus as this season goes on. As I write out this reply, the pregame folks on NBC are having a hearty laugh while showing a sign at the Bears game today, and I think Garrett mentions that the Bears get the 2nd round pick this year too. Har har.

We are in a poo situation. Only 12 more losses to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

It's not about that dude. Of course the roster is bad even with a qb, BUT...you still have to go out and play games in the mean time. WE WEREN'T EVEN A FUNCTIONAL OFFENSE WITH BRYCE. It's like getting in a car to drive that won't even start much less move. That is beyond bad for a professional team. 

What part of that are yall still having trouble UNDERSTANDING??? 

Ironically the most functional the offense looked is when Bryce played in garbage time. 
 

Y’all don’t understand football is about more than just one guy even when that guy is a QB. Most of y’all just need lives outside of Panther football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

If "see it wasn't Bryce Young's fault" is all someone takes from today they are beyond help and just pushing an agenda.

And regardless of the QB situation we are on our third coaching staff in three years already. If you want to keep being the doormat to the entire league then keep firing coaches every year and see where that gets you.

Well it isn’t his fault. Maybe you should ask yourself the opposite. As in why we suck no matter who the QB is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Ironically the most functional the offense looked is when Bryce played in garbage time. 
 

Y’all don’t understand football is about more than just one guy even when that guy is a QB. Most of y’all just need lives outside of Panther football. 

You mean today? Because otherwise absolutely wrong. 

And big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

So, there is a tendency to be a bit of an echo chamber here. The easy national narrative that we did Bust Young wrong is going to come right back into focus as this season goes on. As I write out this reply, the pregame folks on NBC are having a hearty laugh while showing a sign at the Bears game today, and I think Garrett mentions that the Bears get the 2nd round pick this year too. Har har.

We are in a poo situation. Only 12 more losses to go.

Most of us here could give decent to pretty good analysis of the Panthers. Our knowledge of most other teams however would be limited to stuff we've heard from various sources (and not especially reliable).

It's why I prefer local beat writers to national guys. They're not as well known and might not have had football careers, but they're only trying to cover a single team.

In-depth knowledge of 32 teams at once would be an extremely difficult thing to maintain.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AceBoogie said:

Well it isn’t his fault. Maybe you should ask yourself the opposite. As in why we suck no matter who the QB is 

I don't need to. I know. I've watched it all go down for years. You don't seem to notice that things are turning around on offense without him, despite the fits and starts that we are going through. I guess you are a big Bryce advocate? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Could’ve told yall this was going to happen. Dalton hasn’t had a winning season since 2015, he’s a BACKUP for a reason. Teams have tape on him and what Canales is doing so running the same crap isn’t going to work. 

Look, I don't think Andy is a world beater, but since leaving Cincy he hasn't exactly been in ideal situations.  Outside of Dallas, he came onto teams in the middle of transition to offer a steady hand and leadership.  And coming here, transition isn't the only obstacle...  we are a team with almost zero depth and almost 5 years or so of drafts that we have little to nothing to show for.  Now add to that, half our projected starters are injured.  Who tf can win with that?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Ironically the most functional the offense looked is when Bryce played in garbage time. 
 

Y’all don’t understand football is about more than just one guy even when that guy is a QB. Most of y’all just need lives outside of Panther football. 

LMAOOOOO.......you cant be serious with this statement. Like I said we are lost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Most of us here could give decent to pretty good analysis of the Panthers. Our knowledge of most other teams however would be limited to stuff we've heard from various sources (and not especially reliable).

It's why I prefer local beat writers to national guys. They're not as well known and might not have had football careers, but they're only trying to cover a single team.

In-depth knowledge of 32 teams at once would be an extremely difficult thing to maintain.

Many years back I heard Colin Cowherd arguing whether or not Mario Williams was worthy of being the #1 pick in that year's upcoming draft. His take was he didn't know how good he might really be, because Williams played in the ACC, and got his stats by playing against the Georgia Techs and NC States of college football.

The local guys don't get the exposure though, they don't have the platform. When the day comes, however far down the line, when we are good again, it will be met with disbelief and disdain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...