Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Defensive Futility Tracker

kungfoodude

By kungfoodude,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Not a big deal. If you want specifics, just ask and I will dig them up. I want this to be informative.

I was just wondering if there were a predominance of low ranking attached to particular years. I think I assumed it covered all the years. I am bad for skimming stuff and not thoroughly reading through it.

It's not a big thing. I get curious - but man those things are rabbit holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, strato said:

I was just wondering if there were a predominance of low ranking attached to particular years. I think I assumed it covered all the years. I am bad for skimming stuff and not thoroughly reading through it.

It's not a big thing. I get curious - but man those things are rabbit holes.

So what were you thinking? Bottom 10 ranking for each?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Can you track our injuries compared to those of other teams? Seems like we are always at the top of the most injured teams… 

It seems like that stuff runs in certain places and I wonder about the training regimens, and for sure the turf. Maybe the people assigned to these positions have a better or worse effect on things... all that stuff.

I'm on Tepper about that turf; he is ridiculous. Says he wants to win.

Hire someone to figure it out and pay them. Not like he can't recoup plenty of profit still. The valuation of the team is constantly rising. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

So what were you thinking? Bottom 10 ranking for each?

Well, I was just musing if my memories, which aren't that great on old stuff, corresponded with the bottom rankings yeah. 

Like if one year's team had a ton of bottom rankings in those different categories, that would be interesting. If I am expressing myself correctly. 

It's probably poo that should remain obscure and that's why I didn't want to push it. (like how many would really care about it, too much trouble..)

 

edit again: I think I was looking for something like a voting deal where so many points for a 1st place, down to last place, and seeing who totaled...  like the aggregate score of all 30 fuging years so it's probably a little much

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • beo
      2024 College Football Thread

      By beo · Posted

      I'm not sure I'm understanding why you'd arbitrarily cut off ACC titles before 2005 even though they are identical in weight. It's not like a meaningless game makes them any less valuable, especially since that game is usually just a blowout anyways. But even working off of this metric, you disingenuously make UNC-CH sound like it's some powerhouse that goes to the ACC title game on a regular basis. UNC-CH has 2 total appearances since 2005, a whopping one more than Duke and tied with Wake (whom actually won one of theirs). The inclusion of State there is sure doing some heavy lifting. I mean, hanging your hat on two players is a bit strange, no? Everyone knows those teams were largely carried by those QBs. And two of those wins over Duke were giftwrapped by the refs, especially that joke in 2023. Two more were the result of the fallout from Cutt staying on for longer than he should've. The only reason UNC-CH football is in a state as good as it's in is because y'all live off your brand. Fans expecting a program that hasn't won an ACC title in 44 years to be focused on winning them every year is a huge reach no matter how you slice it. If UNC-CH fans sincerely think this way, then I can only conclude that Tarheel football fans are rather delusional. 
    • strato
      As fans have we unanimously concluded that Bryce Young IS THE PROBLEM

      By strato · Posted

      You clearly don't understand the level of disgust. We have had it with him. 
    • MillionDollarCam
      2024 College Football Thread

      By MillionDollarCam · Posted

      With all due respect, no one gives a poo about who won the ACC in 1963. Bottom line is over the past 10 years UNC has been a much better football program than Duke and had championship aspirations when they were getting elite play from the QB position.
×
×
  • Create New...